Is the moon's Hill Sphere the same as its Roche Radius?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter naranekkosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of the Moon's Hill Sphere and Roche Radius, particularly in relation to the stability of artificial satellites in orbit around the Moon. Participants explore the implications of these concepts for future lunar colonization and satellite deployment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether the Moon has its own Roche Radius, which would determine the distance at which objects are no longer pulled towards it by gravity.
  • There is a clarification that the Roche Radius is not a fixed barrier but rather a critical distance where an orbiting body may be tidally disrupted, influenced by variables such as density and tensile strength.
  • Others suggest looking at the Hill Sphere as the distance from the Moon where a satellite could maintain a stable orbit, noting that it is related to the Roche lobe.
  • A formula for calculating the Hill Sphere is provided, indicating a distance of approximately 60,000 km from the Moon, with the caveat that solar gravitational effects may require further corrections.
  • One participant reflects on the historical context of the Roche limit and its implications for the Moon's formation and tidal effects on early Earth, raising questions about the relationship between tidal forces and the origin of life.
  • Another participant introduces a hypothetical scenario involving a "dumb bell" structure orbiting the Moon, questioning whether its maximum stable altitude would align with the Hill limit or be smaller.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the Hill Sphere and Roche Radius, with some emphasizing the stability of orbits while others focus on tidal disruption. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific implications of these limits for satellite deployment and historical lunar dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on various assumptions regarding satellite properties, the effects of solar gravity, and the specific conditions under which the Roche limit and Hill Sphere apply.

naranekkosh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
does the moon have it sown roghe radius? where objects need to be at a certain distance so that the gravity of the moon doesn't pull that object towards the moon? like an artificial communications satellite when we eventually colonize the moon...what is the distance a satellite needs to be to avoid being pulled in. does it matter on that size/mass of the artifical satellite?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
naranekkosh said:
does the moon have it sown roghe radius? where objects need to be at a certain distance so that the gravity of the moon doesn't pull that object towards the moon? like an artificial communications satellite when we eventually colonize the moon...what is the distance a satellite needs to be to avoid being pulled in. does it matter on that size/mass of the artifical satellite?
The Roche radius is not a fixed barrier below which an orbiting body is pulled to the larger body. It is the critical distance closer than which an orbiting body will be tidally disrupted and torn apart by the larger body. There are many variables that affect the limit of any particular orbiting body, including relative density and tensile strength. This will help:

http://www.answers.com/topic/roche-limit
 
Perhaps you should look instead at the Hill Sphere, the approximate distance from the moon at which a satellite could have a stable orbit. It's somewhat related to the Roche lobe, so maybe that's what you were thinking of. Anyway, it would be given by:

[tex]r=r_m(\frac{M_m}{3(M_m+M_e)})^{1/3}[/tex]

This gives a distance of 15% the distance between the Earth and the moon (~60,000 km). There would be other corrections due to the sun's gravity, however, and I won't try to approximate those.

Oh, and for any reasonably-sized satellite, this wouldn't depend on the properties of the satellite.
 
Last edited:
SpaceTiger said:
Perhaps you should look instead at the Hill Sphere, the approximate distance from the moon at which a satellite could have a stable orbit. It's somewhat related to the Roche lobe, so maybe that's what you were thinking of. Anyway, it would be given by:

[tex]r=r_m(\frac{M_m}{3(M_m+M_e)})^{1/3}[/tex]

This gives a distance of 15% the distance between the Earth and the moon (~60,000 km). There would be other corrections due to the sun's gravity, however, and I won't try to approximate those.

Oh, and for any reasonably-sized satellite, this wouldn't depend on the properties of the satellite.
Thanks for infro - I had never heard of "Hill Sphere" before, but knew about Roche limit. I believe R.L. sets a limit on when the Earth got it's moon as reversing time and making reasonable assumptions about tidal dissipation, torques, land /water geometry, etc. one can calculate how long ago the moon would have been at the Roche limit. Days would have been much shorter then and tides much larger.
I think the Earth is older, so we definitely got it later, not at same time as Earth was forming. I also think I have read that the tides would have been more than 100 feet of tide in open ocean. -Do you know anything about this? With two large tides coming every day (of much less than 24 hours) it seems very reasonable that life in the water would be the obvious choice, but I don't know much about how this "short days/ large tides" period relates to the origin of life.

Also there may be another limit of interest. Like Roche limit, its value would depend upon the particular body orbiting. Thus I will assume a "dumb bell" of two equal masses separated by a semis-rigid rod of 100 feet (or meters, if you like). Rod is "semi-rigid" so when it flexes, it dissipates energy. In the moon's gravity gradient the dumb bell can have the rod axis pointing at the center of the moon, provided it is orbit about the moon and not too far from moon. (assume circular orbit)

My second question (and assumption) is about the maximum altitude of the dumb bell in which it is stably pointing at the moon. (good for communication antennas relaying msg between settlements in different locations) Is it the same as the Hill limit or smaller? (Lets neglect the Earth.) Know any thing about this?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K