Web services to eliminate the OS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aychamo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Os Web
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of transitioning traditional software applications to web-based services, with a focus on word processing and document management. Participants explore the implications of this shift for operating systems, user accessibility, and the feasibility of offline functionality.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that web applications could replace traditional software, allowing users to access tools like word processors from any internet-connected device.
  • Others argue that reliance on internet connectivity for accessing documents poses significant drawbacks, particularly for offline work and data security.
  • A participant mentions the potential for web-based applications to integrate with existing services like Gmail for file storage, but acknowledges the need for local copies for offline access.
  • Concerns are raised about the performance and security implications of running complex applications online, with some suggesting that only basic functionalities may be feasible in a web environment.
  • Historical context is provided by a participant who compares the concept to mainframe computing, noting that while advantageous in some scenarios, such configurations are not universally applicable.
  • There is a discussion about the technical requirements for web applications, including the need for client-side processing to ensure a responsive user experience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no consensus reached. Some see potential in web applications, while others emphasize the importance of local software for reliability and performance.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unresolved nature of connectivity issues, the varying definitions of what constitutes a "web application," and the differing perspectives on security and performance trade-offs.

aychamo
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Hello there;

A recent idea that some are talking about (a lot of slashdot), is that some software companies (ie, Google, Mozilla) will start to make what used to be applications become web services. For example, instead of loading MS Word on your PC, you would go to a website that has basically MS Word as a web-app, and you would save your documents there. It would all be through the browser. This is pretty similar to web-based email, in that it would just be web-based word processing.

The problem with it is that you coudln't edit your documents without beign on the internet. So you'd have to download like a standalone version. But using XUL or whatever the **** is called that Firefox is coded in, it could be platform independent.

The idea of this, of course, is to make the operating system irrelevant.

If Google's GMail could setup an area to just store files in it or whatever, like a virtual hard drive, I would have no problem going to a web-app that is a clone of MS Word (the web-apps would have to have at least the same functionality) and doing my **** there and saving it onto my internet hd. It would mean I could access any document and edit it from anywhere in the world.

Again there is problems for when you want to work offline, so saving local copies is a neccesary thing.

Other examples of stuff like this is del.icio.us , which is a social bookmark manager, but the point is you keep your bookmarks there and you can acecss them from any website.. And they easily integrate into Firefox.

And, I just saw this on http://slashdot.org today: http://sproutliner.com/ which seems to be something to help keep track of todo lists, etc.

I dunno..

What do yall think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
So what is the proposed technology: keeping the word-processing or whatever application on the web server or loading it to the client browser? If it were the latter, it would take really, really much time to load and that's too bad.
I see few advantages with making docs online except the idea of internet virtual storage. Processing and storing documents in my local computer remains the most optimal way ever, offering me convenience, performance, and last but not least security.
 
I've heard of this, but I'm just not buying it (literally or figuratively). I want my programs on my hard drive because I want to be able to access them even if I'm not online. We're nowhere near the point where we have enough connectivity to justify having everything online. Not even the cell phone network has the kind of reliability/coverage required for this.
 
So are you saying that if the connectivity were there you think it would be more feasible?

We already have text editing stuff like Wiki's. It seems like most basic word processing functionality is pretty easy to implement. I mean, stuff like GMail's Rich Formating for entering text isn't too far off of what most people do in word processing.

I totally see the need for privacy. Perhaps you would only opt to store certain files online, that you may need at some point somewhere else in the world.

As far as connectivity goes, I'm getting pretty lucky lately. In the airports I've been in, we get to go to the President's club and they have free WiFi. You could of course sit outside their doors and leach it. Every hotel I've been in the past few trips (Puerto Rico, St. Maarten [Caribbean], Ohio, etc) has had either WiFi or free LAN-Internet. And there are those cell-phone PCMCIA cards to give you internet access on the cell network.

Of course .. All that involves having your laptop, which would already have the word processing functionality and the files stored on it..

But that one time when you don't have your laptop, if you just were at an internet terminal it would be nice to be able to access your stuff. Perhaps just automatically keeping copies of some things on the net, like in a personal FTP archive, or the likes of that.. ??

BTW, I'm not saying I am for or against this, or that I really know much about it. I'm actually posting to find out more info, or get more ideas on it..
 
I think anything beyond basis word processing or email won't work. YOu can't load and run Half Life 2 like this lol. It also opens up a huge security problem. Companies wouldn't dare go for this idea lest they want all their customers information and all company information out on the internet.
 
This is not even remotely a new idea. Such an application server is called a "mainframe," and the clients are called "terminals" (or "thin clients" in newspeak). There are some situations where this kind of configuration is advantageous, but such situations are rare.

- Warren
 
Yah but weren't they using very simplistic operating systems with simplistic tasks? I am sure you wouldn't want to ever load windows XP Pro off a mainframe and run half life or a video editing program off it..
 
Yeah, but no one is talking about playing video games. They are talking about simple web-apps for editing documents and what not..
 
aychamo said:
Yeah, but no one is talking about playing video games. They are talking about simple web-apps for editing documents and what not..

Even editors and simple word-processors require processing capabilities in the client side to offer the WYSIWYG for viewing the formatted text, and other options as well. If everything is done by communicating with the server a lot of bandwidth is unnecessarily consumed not to mention the performance tradeoff.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
52K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K