Finding Flaw in Reasoning: Complex Fun

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Fun
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying flaws in a sequence of mathematical reasoning involving complex numbers and square roots. Participants explore the implications of operations on complex numbers, particularly focusing on the square root of negative numbers and the properties of division in the complex plane.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the flaw in the reasoning lies in the incorrect manipulation of complex numbers, particularly in the transition from one line to another where cancellation occurs incorrectly.
  • Others propose that the definition of the square root operation must be carefully considered, especially regarding the domain of negative numbers.
  • A participant suggests that the equality \(\frac{1}{i} = -i\) can be demonstrated through the properties of multiplicative inverses in complex numbers.
  • Another participant points out that the fundamental error is in the assumption that \(\sqrt{-1} = i\) without acknowledging the existence of multiple roots in the complex number system.
  • Some participants express confusion over the cancellation of terms in complex division, with differing views on whether \(\frac{i}{i}\) should equal 1 or -1.
  • A later reply emphasizes that every complex number has two square roots, which complicates the reasoning presented in the original argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the specific flaws in the reasoning. Multiple competing views remain regarding the properties of complex numbers and the validity of certain mathematical operations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions and properties of square roots in the complex plane, as well as the implications of division involving complex numbers. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in mathematical definitions when dealing with complex numbers.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Find the flaw in the following reasoning:

[tex]-4 = -4[/tex]

[tex]\frac{-4}{1} = \frac{4}{-1}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{-4}{1}} = \sqrt{\frac{4}{-1}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\sqrt{-4}}{1} = \frac{\sqrt{4}}{\sqrt{-1}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\sqrt{-1}\sqrt{4}}{1} = \frac{\sqrt{4}}{\sqrt{-1}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{2i}{1} = \frac{2}{i}[/tex]

[tex]2i^2 = 2[/tex]

[tex]-2 = 2[/tex]


It's clear that the equality [itex]\frac{2i}{1} = \frac{2}{i}[/itex] is wrong because on the LHS we have a complex number (of the form a + ib) but the RHS is not. But the real flaw is probably higher. Any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the mistake is in passing from the 3rd to last to the 2nd to last line:

namely, you multiply both sides by i and cancel

[tex]\frac{i}{i} \neq 1[/tex]

it is -1.
 
How do you show that?

Also, how do you show that

1/i = -i ?
 
Last edited:
The domain of the square root operation must be kept to fractions in which only the numerator can be negative in order for it to be well-defined for negative real numbers, ie. to be explicit, your real number must be in the form [tex]a/b, \ a \in \mathbb{R}, \ b \in \mathbb{R}^+/\{0\}[/tex]. Here's something simpler, that also appears to work, but is wrong for the same reason:

[tex]i = \sqrt{-1} = \frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{-1}} = \frac{1}{i} \Longrightarrow 1=-1[/tex]

The root of the problem is that

[tex]\frac{1}{i}=i[/tex]

is not valid according to common definitions. In fact, using standard definitions, you get

[tex]\frac{1}{i} = -i,[/tex]

instead, since

[tex]\frac{1}{i} = \frac{1}{i}\cdot \frac{-i}{-i} = \frac{-i}{1} = -i.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
the mistake is in passing from the 3rd to last to the 2nd to last line:

namely, you multiply both sides by i and cancel

[tex]\frac{i}{i} \neq 1[/tex]

it is -1.

This is wrong.


As you get quite quickly from my last post,

[tex]\frac{i}{i} = i \frac{1}{i} = i(-i) = 1.[/tex]

As a matter of fact, the whole purpose of this is to make sure (well, in fact we assume it, in order to make the complex numbers into a nicely organized field) that

[tex]\frac{i}{i} = 1.[/tex]

The REAL root of the problem, of course, is that every complex number has two square roots, and the square root operator must choose only one of them to give you if it is to be well-defined. We then need to choose which "nice" properties we want the operator to keep, and typically, we choose those I have mentioned above.
 
Last edited:
It might have something to do with the fact that [(-1)^(1/2)]*[(-1)^(1/2)] does not equal [(-1)*(-1)]^(1/2) which equals 1^(1/2), because we know by definition of i that [(-1)^(1/2)]*[(-1)^(1/2)] should equal -1.

Sorry for the ugly equations; I don't know how to make the fancy things you guys can do.

EDIT: Uh, never mind, those posts just before mine made sense...
 
Last edited:
First off,
[tex]\frac{1}{i} = -i[/tex]
To see this, I'd first like to point out:
[tex]\frac{1}{z}[/tex]
is just notation for: The number which is the multiplicative inverse of [itex]z[/itex].
In otherwords, 1/z is that number which when multiplied by z gives 1, ie-
[tex]z\frac{1}{z} = 1[/tex]

That being said
[tex]i^2 = -1[/tex]

[tex]i\cdot i = -1[/tex]

[tex]-1 \cdot i \cdot i = (-1)(-1)[/tex]

[tex]( -i )(i) = i \cdot (-i) = 1[/tex]

Therefore,
[tex]\frac{1}{i} = -i[/tex]
by the above argument
 
That's fine (I posted it already above). But your earlier statement,

[tex]\frac{i}{i} \neq 1,[/tex]

is wrong (as you in fact showed in your post directly above this one).
 
joeboo said:
First off,
[tex]\frac{1}{i} = -i[/tex]
To see this, I'd first like to point out:
[tex]\frac{1}{z}[/tex]
is just notation for: The number which is the multiplicative inverse of [itex]z[/itex].
In otherwords, 1/z is that number which when multiplied by z gives 1, ie-
[tex]z\frac{1}{z} = 1[/tex]

That being said
[tex]i^2 = -1[/tex]

[tex]i\cdot i = -1[/tex]

[tex]-1 \cdot i \cdot i = (-1)(-1)[/tex]

[tex]( -i )(i) = i \cdot (-i) = 1[/tex]

Therefore,
[tex]\frac{1}{i} = -i[/tex]
by the above argument

haha ok it's that simple.
 
  • #10
The fundamental error is writing [itex]\sqrt{-1}= i[/itex]. -1, like any number has two roots. In the real numbers, we can distinguish between the positive and negative roots. Since the complex numbers cannot be ordered, we cannot do that in general. It is better to define complex numbers as pairs of real numbers (a, b) defining sum (a,b)+ (c,d)= (a+c,b+d) and product (a,b)*(c,d)= (ac- bd,ac+bd). Using that definition, the "paradox" disappears.
 
  • #11
Data said:
That's fine (I posted it already above). But your earlier statement,

[tex]\frac{i}{i} \neq 1,[/tex]

is wrong (as you in fact showed in your post directly above this one).

Heh. I made an error, fixed it, and didn't realize the error. :blushing:

Thanks for pointing it out so kindly ( honest )
 
  • #12
joeboo said:
the mistake is in passing from the 3rd to last to the 2nd to last line:

namely, you multiply both sides by i and cancel

[tex]\frac{i}{i} \neq 1[/tex]

it is -1.

As far as I know, x over x cancels out to positive one, not negative
 
  • #13
[tex]\frac{x}{x} = \Big \{ \begin{array}{cr} 1 & x \neq 0 \\ \mbox{undefined} & x=0\end{array}, \ x \in \mathbb{C}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K