Total Charge what? potential by line inter

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total charge from a given potential equation and understanding the implications of charge density in relation to electric fields. The context involves concepts from electrostatics, specifically relating to potential and charge distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between potential, charge density, and total charge, questioning the limits of integration for calculating total charge. There is also a discussion about the nature of the potential and its applicability across different radii.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants raising questions about the specifics of the problem, including the limits for integration and the validity of the potential equation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the charge density and the implications of integrating from different limits.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the definition of total charge and the appropriate limits for integration, particularly concerning the behavior of the potential at different distances. Participants are also considering the implications of starting the integral at zero versus a finite radius.

Phymath
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
alright, so i got this potentional equation [tex]\Phi = k_e Q e^{-\alpha r}/r[/tex]
it askes me to find the total charge after calcing the charge density, so
anyway...lets get the field [tex]\vec{E}=-\nabla \Phi[/tex]
so yea then take the divergence fot the charge density
[tex]\nabla \bullet \vec{E} = 4 \pi k_e p[/tex]
so then I am assuming to figure out the "total charge" I am going to use the density in a volume intergral and equate that to [tex]4 \pi k_e Q_{enclosed}[/tex] but what is my limit? is it is a sphere i can define by radius a as my surface? or what?


next question

finding the potential associated with a Vector field A by line intergration in polar cords (or any cords for that matter) what's that mean
[tex]\oint \vec{A} \bullet d\vec{r} = \Phi (b) - \Phi (a)[/tex] is that what they're talking about let me know
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't exactly follow what you are talking about in the first case. Perpaps you could state the problem more specifically. The potential certainly suggests a spherically symmetric charge distribution. Is that potential good for all r?

Your second question is more or less right, but that integration symbol is for closed path integrals where the resulting potential difference would be zero. You want an integral from point a to point b.
 
alright arlight,

the first one the total charge is what I am asking what is the "total charge" mean

[tex]\int \int^{2\pi}_0 \int^{\pi}_0 \nabla \bullet (-\nabla \Phi) dV = 4 \pi k_e Q_e[/tex]
whats the last limits to solve for [tex]Q_e[/tex]
 
Have you calculated divE yet? That gives you the charge density anywhere in space. So...how far out does your integral have to go?
 
charge density is, [tex]p = Q \alpha^2 e^{-\alpha r}}/(4 \pi r)[/tex] so I am thinking infinity which the intergral is undefined there
 
Assuming your charge density is correct (I think it is), the problem with the integral is not the limit at infinity, it's the limit at zero. I believe that if you start the integral at some radius b, you get a gamma function for the result. That's why I was initially wondering if the potential was good for all values of r.

I'm not suggesting that you don't learn to integrate, but I was never that great at it, so I'm glad things like this are on the internet.

http://www.hostsrv.com/webmab/app1/MSP/quickmath/02/pageGenerate?site=quickmath&s1=calculus&s2=integrate&s3=advanced
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OlderDan,

But won't there be a differential volume element r^2dr?
 

Similar threads

Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K