Approximating Alternating Series w/ 0.0000001 Accuracy: 4 Terms Needed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around approximating the sum of an alternating series to a specified accuracy of 0.0000001. Participants are examining how many terms are needed in the series expansion to achieve this level of precision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the convergence of the series and the criteria for determining the number of terms needed for a specific accuracy. They discuss the relationship between the terms of the series and the remainder estimation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the calculation of the terms and their magnitudes, questioning the reasoning behind the number of terms required. There is an exploration of the inequality related to the remainder of the series, and some clarification on the significance of the fourth and fifth terms in relation to the desired accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of examples in their resources, which contributes to their confusion. There is also a mention of the specific threshold for the remainder that needs to be met to determine the number of terms required.

ProBasket
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n = 1 - \frac {(0.3)^2}{2!} + \frac {(0.3)^4}{4!} - \frac {(0.3)^6}{6!} + \frac {(0.3)^8}{8!} - ...[/tex]

how many terms do you have to go for your approximation (your partial sum) to be within 0.0000001 from the convergent value of that series?


the answer to this question is 4, but i don't know how the book got 4. Probably a real easy question, but I am really confuse since there are no examples i can find, so can someone help? i really don't even know where to start, but i found this:

[tex]|s-s_n| \leq |s_n+1 - s_n| = b_n +1[/tex]

any help will be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ProBasket said:
[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n = 1 - \frac {(0.3)^2}{2!} + \frac {(0.3)^4}{4!} - \frac {(0.3)^6}{6!} + \frac {(0.3)^8}{8!} - ...[/tex]

how many terms do you have to go for your approximation (your partial sum) to be within 0.0000001 from the convergent value of that series?


the answer to this question is 4, but i don't know how the book got 4. Probably a real easy question, but I am really confuse since there are no examples i can find, so can someone help? i really don't even know where to start, but i found this:

[tex]|s-s_n| \leq |s_n+1 - s_n| = b_n +1[/tex]

any help will be appreciated

Calculate the values of each of the terms and note the progression of the sizes of them. Isn't that inequality supposed to be

[tex]|s-s_n| \leq |s_{n+1} - s_n| = b_{n +1}[/tex]

It is saying that the absolute value of the remainder after n terms will be no greater than the absolute value of the difference between the sum to n + 1 terms and the sum to n terms. Another way of saying that is look at the next term.

http://www.mathwords.com/a/alternating_series_remainder.htm

For an alternating series, you only have to look at the magnitude of the first term you are dropping from the sum to estimate the remainder.
 
OlderDan said:
Calculate the values of each of the terms and note the progression of the sizes of them.

well the 4th term is [tex]\frac{(0.3)^6}/{6!}[/tex] but it comes out to .000001


and the 5th term has 8 zeros, so the 4th term is closer to the value 0.0000001. so is that how the book got 4th term as an answer?
 
The question is asking to find [itex]n[/itex] such that:

[tex]s - s_n < 10^{-7}[/tex]

Once youve found the first n, there's no need to go further.
 
ProBasket said:
well the 4th term is [tex]\frac{(0.3)^6}/{6!}[/tex] but it comes out to .000001


and the 5th term has 8 zeros, so the 4th term is closer to the value 0.0000001. so is that how the book got 4th term as an answer?

It is not a question of being closer. It is a question of greater than or lesser than. The fourth term is ten times bigger than the permitted remainder, so you have to keep it. You would have to keep it even if its value were .00000010000. . .000001. The first term you can leave out is the first term that is smaller than .00000001. That is the fifth term. That is how the book got the answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
993
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K