Vertical Missile Launch: Will it Hit Its Target After 20 Minutes?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter darkar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the trajectory of a missile launched vertically for 20 minutes, specifically whether it will land back at its original launch point assuming no air resistance. Participants explore the implications of the Coriolis effect and the conservation of angular momentum in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that without air resistance, the missile will land directly back at the launch point.
  • Others argue that the Coriolis effect will cause the missile to land to the west of the launch point unless launched from the poles.
  • A participant questions the application of angular momentum and its relevance to the missile's trajectory, suggesting that the moment of inertia does not change during flight.
  • Another participant describes the missile's flight as an orbital mechanics problem, stating that it will follow an elliptical orbit and land 5 degrees west of the launch point after 20 minutes.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the missile's velocity and the Earth's rotation, suggesting that if the velocity is less than escape velocity, the missile remains with the Earth.
  • There is a clarification about the Coriolis effect, with one participant noting that it behaves differently for vertical motion compared to horizontal motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of the Coriolis effect and angular momentum on the missile's landing point, indicating that there is no consensus on the outcome of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions regarding the neglect of air resistance and the specific conditions of the launch (e.g., latitude) are critical to the arguments presented. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the Coriolis effect and its implications for vertical motion.

darkar
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Let say u can fire a missile vertically, and it will only return to ground after 20 mins, will the missile hit right on where it was fired?

P/s: Assuming there is no resistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If no wind resistance, yeah.
 
Sure will. And it'll land completely vertically too
 
If you fire it from one of the Poles, yes. Otherwise, no.

Coriolis...
 
Pete, can you explain your position?

The coriolis effect diminishes when neglecting wind resistance, and also according to this site is zero at the equator, not the poles:

The amount of deflection the air makes is directly related to both the speed at which the air is moving and its latitude. Therefore, slowly blowing winds will be deflected only a small amount, while stronger winds will be deflected more. Likewise, winds blowing closer to the poles will be deflected more than winds at the same speed closer to the equator. The Coriolis force is zero right at the equator.

http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/fw/crls.rxml
 
The angular momentum of the missile is conserved.
[tex]L=mr^2\omega[/tex].
As r increases, [tex]\omega[/tex] will become smaller.
The missile will land to the West of you., except at a pole, as Pete said.
 
Last edited:
Can you define your variables? mr^2 represents the moment of inertia which doesn't change during the course of flight, so I don't see why any of this should happen.

Also close your tex tags with a / not \
 
If you neglect air resistance, this can be seen as an orbital mechanics problem.

The missile's initial trajectory is the sum of it upward boost, plus its eastward velocity imparted by the rotation of the Earth.

The moment its rocket shuts off, it is in orbit about the Earth's centre of mass. The orbit is elliptical.

When it reaches the Earth's surface on the return part of its orbit, 20 minutes later, the Earth will have rotated by 5 degrees.
 
My r was the distance from the center of the Earth, which increases as the rocket goes up.
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
If you neglect air resistance, this can be seen as an orbital mechanics problem.

The missile's initial trajectory is the sum of it upward boost, plus its eastward velocity imparted by the rotation of the Earth.

The moment its rocket shuts off, it is in orbit about the Earth's centre of mass. The orbit is elliptical.

When it reaches the Earth's surface on the return part of its orbit, 20 minutes later, the Earth will have rotated by 5 degrees.

Since v < v_esc, it doesn't breach the atmosphere and it remains with the earth, its rotating along with it, isn't it? The same reason a helicopter doesn't land west of where it started while hovering in the same place?
 
  • #11
whozum said:
Since v < v_esc, it doesn't breach the atmosphere and it remains with the earth, its rotating along with it, isn't it? The same reason a helicopter doesn't land west of where it started while hovering in the same place?
The initial post clearly indicates discounting air reisistance. This post ws a waste of time and space.
 
  • #12
So your saying BECAUSE there's no air resistance the rocket will land to the west?

If the space is bothering you feel free to delete the post, but I'm sorry if I wasted 8 seconds of your life reading that ;)
 
  • #13
Hi whozum,
Yes, that's right. In this case, air resistance (if the air is moving with Earth, ie no crosswind) helps to keep the rocket over the launch pad.

I'm a bit fuzzy on the details of Coriolis, but I think it works differently for North-South motion (zero at Equator, max at Poles) that for vertical motion (zero at poles, max at Equator).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
2K