Is there an opposite to omnipotence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PIT2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of omnipotence and whether an opposite exists. Participants explore definitions and implications of omnipotence, as well as potential terms for its opposite, including considerations of physical existence and power dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the opposite of omnipotence exists and suggests various terms like impotence, nihipotence, or nonpotence.
  • Another participant argues that, regarding physical existence, it is impossible to exist without occupying space, implying that the opposite of omnipotence may depend on definitions.
  • Impotence is mentioned as a real condition, with one participant humorously noting its relevance to the discussion.
  • A participant provides a definition of omnipotence from Wikipedia, describing it as "power with no limits," and proposes that the opposite would be "something with no power whatsoever."
  • One participant expresses a change in position after considering the definition and mentions impotence in the context of slavery.
  • A later reply seeks clarification on the term "esclaves," indicating a need for further discussion on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and existence of an opposite to omnipotence, with no consensus reached on the terminology or implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is limited by varying definitions of omnipotence and its opposite, as well as the implications of physical existence in relation to power.

PIT2
Messages
897
Reaction score
2
Does the opposite of omnipotence exist?

(i don't know the right word for it, is it impotence/nihipotence/nonpotence/something else?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are asking about fisical existence, then no: it is impossible to exist without occupying space (but again, it also depends on your definition fo the opposite of omnipotent. For me, it is that something is nowhere).
 
Impotence certainly exists; many men suffer from it.
 
arildno said:
Impotence certainly exists; many men suffer from it.

haha, good one. but he doesn't mean it that way...
 
<<<GUILLE>>> said:
If you are asking about fisical existence, then no: it is impossible to exist without occupying space (but again, it also depends on your definition fo the opposite of omnipotent. For me, it is that something is nowhere).

I found this definition of omnipotence on wikipedia:

Omnipotence (literally, "all power") is power with no limits or inexhaustible, in other words, unlimited power. This trait is usually attributed only to God.

So i think the opposite of omnipotence would be "something with no power whatsoever".
 
PIT2 said:
I found this definition of omnipotence on wikipedia:



So i think the opposite of omnipotence would be "something with no power whatsoever".

thansk for that, this changes my position.

Yes, impotnece exists: esclaves. (there are still many)
 
What are esclaves?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
12K
  • · Replies 162 ·
6
Replies
162
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
24K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
19K