Gravity & Light: Does Gravitational Field Slow Down?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pizer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravity and light, particularly in the context of black holes. Participants explore whether an object's gravitational field slows down as the light it emits experiences redshift and how this affects the perception of gravitational influence near a black hole's event horizon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if an object's gravitational field must slow down as the light it emits slows down, particularly when falling towards a black hole.
  • Another participant asserts that the speed of light remains constant in a local inertial frame and that the light redshifts rather than slows down.
  • A different participant references general relativity, suggesting that the gravitational field outside a black hole can be determined by the star's properties before it collapses, implying that gravitational effects can be delayed but do not necessarily slow down.
  • This participant also notes that a black hole's gravitational pull can increase as more mass falls into it, indicating that the gravitational field can evolve over time despite delays in light and gravitational effects reaching an observer.
  • Another participant clarifies that a remote observer will perceive light from an object falling into a black hole as increasingly redshifted and that the timing of light pulses sent from the object will appear to lengthen, suggesting a mix-up in understanding these phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravitational fields and the light emitted by objects in extreme gravitational fields, particularly near black holes. There is no consensus on whether gravitational fields slow down in relation to emitted light or how they behave as mass falls into a black hole.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of gravitational fields and light propagation in the context of general relativity, with references to the complexities of gravitational waves and their relationship to changes in acceleration.

Pizer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Something I've been wondering about with gravity and light:

Assuming the speed of gravity is c, does an objects gravitational field have to slow down as light it emits slows down? i.e. as an extreme example, if an object is falling towards a black hole, any light it emits takes longer and longer to reach an observer as it nears the event horizon, so it's gravitational field should take longer and longer [presumably equally as long] to reach the observer as well.

If that is true, can a black hole's gravitational pull ever increase? Would it be possible to have the object's (delayed) gravitational field exist near the event horizon, and have the black hole's gravity increase?

Or is it possible that an objects gravitational field can exceed its light cone?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of light measured in a local intertial frame is c, light does not slow down in the scenario you mentioned it red shifts.
 
Pizer said:
Something I've been wondering about with gravity and light:

Assuming the speed of gravity is c, does an objects gravitational field have to slow down as light it emits slows down? i.e. as an extreme example, if an object is falling towards a black hole, any light it emits takes longer and longer to reach an observer as it nears the event horizon, so it's gravitational field should take longer and longer [presumably equally as long] to reach the observer as well.
Yes, this is basically addressed in this section of the Usenet Physics FAQ:
How does the gravity get out of the black hole?

Purely in terms of general relativity, there is no problem here. The gravity doesn't have to get out of the black hole. General relativity is a local theory, which means that the field at a certain point in spacetime is determined entirely by things going on at places that can communicate with it at speeds less than or equal to c. If a star collapses into a black hole, the gravitational field outside the black hole may be calculated entirely from the properties of the star and its external gravitational field before it becomes a black hole. Just as the light registering late stages in my fall takes longer and longer to get out to you at a large distance, the gravitational consequences of events late in the star's collapse take longer and longer to ripple out to the world at large. In this sense the black hole is a kind of "frozen star": the gravitational field is a fossil field. The same is true of the electromagnetic field that a black hole may possess.
This is the classical answer, they go on to explain that in terms of virtual photons, or "virtual gravitons" if such things exist, the explanation for the black hole's electromagnetic/gravitational field would be a little different.
Pizer said:
If that is true, can a black hole's gravitational pull ever increase? Would it be possible to have the object's (delayed) gravitational field exist near the event horizon, and have the black hole's gravity increase?
A BH's gravity does increase as more mass falls into it, so I'd guess that something along the lines of your second suggestion would be the explanation.

One additional complication is that although gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, gravitational waves are only produced by changes in acceleration, in general relativity the gravitational field acts like it can "extrapolate" the motion of objects which are accelerating at a constant rate. So, for example, the Earth is pulled towards Jupiter's current position (in the frame where both are orbiting at approximately constant speed), not the position it was a few minutes ago. Similarly, electromagnetic fields can "extrapolate" the motion of charges which are moving at constant velocity. See this post along with some of the subsequent posts by pervect for more details.
 
Last edited:
If an object is falling into a black hole, a remote observer will find:
1. beams of light from the object gets redder and redder, i.e. it's wavelength gets longer and longer.
2. if the object send a pulse of light per second according to the clock falling with it,
the observer will find the interval of pulse longer and longer.
I guess you mixed the two together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K