Assume that the earth is perfectly round

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullroar_86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the weight difference of a 100 kg person at the equator versus the poles due to Earth's rotation. It is established that the gravitational acceleration at the equator is approximately 0.03 m/s² less than at the poles. The correct value for gravitational acceleration (g) at the equator is debated, with suggestions of using either 9.8 m/s² or 9.83 m/s², leading to weights of 977 kg or 980 kg respectively. The discussion highlights the importance of precision in numerical values, particularly when considering the equatorial radius of 6378.137 km and the actual force of gravity at the equator being 9.798 m/s².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force calculations
  • Familiarity with centrifugal force concepts
  • Knowledge of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Basic physics principles regarding weight and mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of centrifugal force on weight at different latitudes
  • Explore the precise values of gravitational acceleration at various locations on Earth
  • Learn about the significance of significant figures in scientific measurements
  • Investigate the implications of Earth's rotation on physical phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in the effects of Earth's rotation on weight measurements.

bullroar_86
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
r = 6400 km

how much less does a 100kg person weigh at the equator than at the poles because of the rotation of the earth?


Ok I have figured out that g(equator) is .03 m/s^2 less than it is at the poles due to the rotation on the earth.

so
F(pole) = (100kg)(g)

and

F(equator) = 100kg(g - .03m/s^2)



My question is what should be the value for g in this case?
If i make g = 9.8, then it will be 9.77 at the equator

or should it be g = 9.83 ... making it 9.80 at the equator.

not a big difference, but I'm just wondering which one is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bullroar_86 said:
r = 6400 km

how much less does a 100kg person weigh at the equator than at the poles because of the rotation of the earth?


Ok I have figured out that g(equator) is .03 m/s^2 less than it is at the poles due to the rotation on the earth.

so
F(pole) = (100kg)(g)

and

F(equator) = 100kg(g - .03m/s^2)



My question is what should be the value for g in this case?
If i make g = 9.8, then it will be 9.77 at the equator

or should it be g = 9.83 ... making it 9.80 at the equator.

not a big difference, but I'm just wondering which one is correct.
It should be less. Your centrifugal force is counteracting the force of gravity leaving a net force less than the force of gravity alone. (A good clue is that the problem asked how much less does a person weigh.)

Of course, the problem with this problem is that all of your numbers are rounded to 2 significant digits and you're adjusting the third significant digit. The equatorial radius is actually 6378.137 km and the force of gravity at the equator is actually 9.798 m/s^2. The percentage error due to rounding off is greater than the percentage of the adjustment due to centrifugal force.

Of course, the choice of numbers used probably isn't up to you, so you have to go with what you've been given.
 
bullroar_86 said:
r = 6400 km

how much less does a 100kg person weigh at the equator than at the poles because of the rotation of the earth?


Ok I have figured out that g(equator) is .03 m/s^2 less than it is at the poles due to the rotation on the earth.

so
F(pole) = (100kg)(g)

and

F(equator) = 100kg(g - .03m/s^2)



My question is what should be the value for g in this case?
If i make g = 9.8, then it will be 9.77 at the equator

or should it be g = 9.83 ... making it 9.80 at the equator.

not a big difference, but I'm just wondering which one is correct.

Take the difference between your two forces before substituting in a value for g. Simplify the result. Then think about your final question again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K