Deriving Inverse Hyperbolic Functions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MattL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Inverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the inverse hyperbolic function arcsinh(x) from the definition of the hyperbolic sine function sinh(x). The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of the properties of these functions.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for a method to derive arcsinh(x) from sinh(x).
  • Another participant provides a derivation starting from the definition of sinh(x) and sets up a quadratic equation in terms of e^z.
  • A third participant notes the need to specify the domain for the quadratic equation, indicating that while sinh is defined for all real numbers, the inverse may have different restrictions.
  • Another participant suggests that arcsinh is defined for all real numbers, contrasting it with arccosh, which has a domain restriction.
  • There is uncertainty expressed regarding the conditions for arctanh.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the domain of arcsinh and other inverse hyperbolic functions, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for clarity on the domain of arcsinh and other inverse hyperbolic functions, as well as the implications of the quadratic equation derived.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in hyperbolic functions, their inverses, and mathematical derivations may find this discussion relevant.

MattL
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question

Can anyone give a method to derive arcsinh(x) from the definition of sinh(x)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\sinh{x} = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}[/tex].

Assuming the existence of arcsinh, for every x we must have:

sinh(arcsinh(x)) = x.

For simplicity, let arcsinh(x) = z, so that

[tex]\sinh(z) = x[/tex]

<=>

[tex]e^z - e^{-z} = 2x[/tex]

<=>

[tex](e^z)^2 - 1 = e^z \cdot 2x[/tex]

That's a quadratic equation in e^z, which can be easily solved.
 
thanks

haven't done that since a-level and had forgotten it completely!
 
Since it's a quadratic equation,u'll need to specify the domain.Note that the direct function is defined on all [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex],while I'm sure u can't say the same about its inverse.

Daniel.
 
I think arcsinh is ok on all of [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]
With arccosh x has to be greater than or equal to one, but I can't remember the conditions for arctanh
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K