Population Growth and Limiting Values: Solving the Logistic Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter shan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a logistic differential equation that models the population growth of a city suburb. The original poster presents an initial value problem involving the population function P(t) and seeks to determine the limiting value of the population as time approaches infinity, as well as the time required for the population to reach half of this limiting value.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the general solution of the logistic equation and uses integration techniques to solve the differential equation. Some participants question the correctness of the original poster's algebraic manipulations and suggest corrections to the formulation of the equations. Others propose explicitly solving for P(t) to clarify the limiting behavior as t approaches infinity.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's work, offering corrections and suggestions for improvement. There is a focus on ensuring the accuracy of the mathematical expressions and exploring the implications of the solutions. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being discussed, and while guidance has been provided, there is no explicit consensus on the final form of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential typos and missing terms in the original poster's equations, which may affect the solution process. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly applying logarithmic properties and algebraic manipulation in solving the differential equation.

shan
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I just want to check my answer for this question:

The population P(t) of a city suburb is governed by the initial value problem

P' = P((10^-2) - (10^-6)P) P(0) = 2000

Time measured in months.
a) What is the limiting value of the population at t approaches infinity?
b) How long before the population is one-half of this limiting value?

a) I used the formula for the general solution
birth-rate/death-rate = 10^-2/10^-6 = 10^4

But I'm not sure if that is what I was supposed to do...

b) Solving the DE
P' = P((10^-2) - (10^-6)P)

[tex]\int \frac{dP}{P(10^{-2}-10^{-6})} = \int dt[/tex]

Using partial fractions, the left can be separated

[tex]\int \frac{10^2}{P} + \frac{10^{-4}}{10^{-2}-10^{-6}P} = \int dt[/tex]

[tex]10^2 * ln(P-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P) = t + c[/tex]

Using the initial value P(0) = 2000, C = 250,000

Half of the limiting value = (10^4)/2 = 5000

Substituting into the equation, t = 139 months (3sf)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your work. Looks like you have lost some terms. You are missing a P in the equation before partial fractions, but your partial fraction expansion looks OK. Your parentheses need some work in

[tex]10^2 * ln(P-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P) = t + c[/tex]

Consequently your C does not look right.

Part a) looks OK. P = [tex]10^4[/tex] is where the derivative goes to zero, so that is the limiting value of P.
 
So, what up Shan? What about when you correct your formula as Dan said, how about solving it "explicitly" for P(t). You can do that? Don't want to? I don't know. However if you did, it would clearly show what the limiting value is as t goes to infinity. Why not try and report it here. :smile:

Edit: Plot too but suppose I shouldn't push it.
 
Last edited:
OlderDan said:
Check your work. Looks like you have lost some terms. You are missing a P in the equation before partial fractions,
lol sorry, sorry, it was a typo. It's supposed to be

[tex]\int \frac{dP}{P(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P)} = \int dt[/tex]

OlderDan said:
Your parentheses need some work in

[tex]10^2 * ln(P-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P) = t + c[/tex]
Another typo... V_V

[tex]10^2 * (lnP-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P)) = t + c[/tex]

so when I rearrange...

[tex]lnP-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P)) = \frac{t + c}{10^2}[/tex]

[tex]ln\frac{P}{10^{-2}-10^{-6}P} = \frac{t + c}{10^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{P}{10^{-2}-10^{-6}P} = e^{\frac{t + c}{10^2}} = Ce^{\frac{t}{100}}[/tex]

One thing I'm not sure about, can I solve for c using the second equation or the third one? Or does it not matter? Because I used the third equation so that I end up with

[tex]\frac{2000}{10^{-2}-10^{-6}*2000} = Ce^0[/tex]

(P(0)=2000)

And c ends up being 250,000

how about solving it "explicitly" for P(t). You can do that?
lol, it's the second case. When I rearrange the equation up the top (presuming that it's right), I got

[tex]P = Ce^{\frac{t}{100}} * (10^{-2}-10^{-6}P)[/tex]

And I don't know how to get rid of the P on the right... (yes, my algebra is bad lol)
 
[tex]lnP-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P)) = \frac{t + c}{10^2}[/tex]

Dude, you gotta' get those parenthesis right:

[tex]ln(P)-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P) = \frac{t + c}{10^2}[/tex]

We're good here. Actually leaving as:

[tex]10^2\{ln(P)-ln(10^{-2}-10^{-6}P)\} = t + c[/tex]

makes it easy to calcualate c but leave it as 'c' until you need it.

Also, those quantities for logarithms, aren't they just:

[tex]\frac{10^{6}P}{10^4-P}[/tex]

So we have:

[tex]ln\{\frac{10^{6}P}{10^4-P}\}=\frac{1}{100}(t+c)[/tex]

So you take exponentials of both sides and get:

[tex]\frac{10^{6}P}{10^4-P}}=e^{1/100(t+c)}[/tex]

This is where you're having problems right, isolating P.

Suppose I have:

[tex]\frac{ax}{1-x}=k[/tex]

Well, multiplying by 1-x gives me:

[tex]ax=k(1-x)[/tex]

soooooo . . . ax=k-kx
ax+xk=k
x(a+k)=k
You got it right?
 
saltydog said:
soooooo . . . ax=k-kx
ax+xk=k
x(a+k)=k
You got it right?
Sorry for the late reply. So are you saying that

P = (10^4 * e^(1/100 (t+c))) / (10^6 + e^(1/100 (t+c)))
 
shan said:
Sorry for the late reply. So are you saying that

P = (10^4 * e^(1/100 (t+c))) / (10^6 + e^(1/100 (t+c)))

That's it. However, if you would divide the numerator and denominator by the numerator, then the limit as t goes to infinity is clear.
 
saltydog said:
That's it. However, if you would divide the numerator and denominator by the numerator, then the limit as t goes to infinity is clear.
Um, is it 0? After I simplify, I get

P = 1 / (10^6 + e^(1/100 (t+c))) * (10^4 * e^(1/100 (t+c)))

Or did I mess up somewhere?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K