Isomorphic Math Help: Proving Quotient Ring and Polynomial Irreducibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxymoron
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two mathematical problems: proving that the quotient ring \(\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1)\) is isomorphic to the field of complex numbers \(\mathbb{C}\), and demonstrating the irreducibility of the polynomial \(x^2+x+1\) over \(\mathbb{Z}_2\).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the properties of the polynomial \(x^2-x+1\) and its implications for the structure of the quotient ring. Questions about the kernel and surjectivity of the homomorphism are raised. The irreducibility of \(x^2+x+1\) is examined through root analysis in \(\mathbb{Z}_2\).

Discussion Status

Some participants provide detailed reasoning and steps toward establishing isomorphisms and irreducibility, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of the necessary conditions for isomorphism and the implications of irreducibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the extent of provided solutions and require independent reasoning.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Questions

1) Let [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] be the ideal for [itex]\mathbb{R}[x][/itex] generated by the polynomial [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex]. Show that the quotient ring [itex]\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1)[/itex] is isomorphic to the field [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex] of complex numbers.

2) Show that the polynomial [itex]x^2+x+1[/itex] is irreducible over [itex]\mathbb{Z}_2[/itex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, they look like questions, all right.
 
Solution

The isomorphism is going to map solutions [itex]x[/itex] of the polynomial [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] to a corresponding complex number [itex]\lambda[/itex] which is also a solution of the equation [itex]\lambda^2 - \lambda +1[/itex].

That is

[tex]a + bx \rightarrow a + b\lambda[/tex]

where [itex]a+bx[/itex] is a linear factor of [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] and [itex]a, b \in \mathbb{R}[/itex].

So take [itex]x \in \mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1)[/itex]. Then [itex]x[/itex] is a solution of [itex]x^2-x+1 = 0[/itex]. Now we take a [itex]\lambda \in \mathbb{C}[/itex] such that [itex]\lambda[/itex] solves [itex]\lambda^2 -\lambda + 1[/itex]. To prove that this is an isomorphism we need to show

[tex](a+bx)(c+dx) \rightarrow (a+b\lambda)(c+d\lambda)[/tex]

[tex](a+bx)(c+dx) = (ac + (bc+ad)x + bdx^2)[/tex]

[tex](a+b\lambda)(c+d\lambda) = ac + (bc+ad)\lambda +bd\lambda^2[/tex]
 
What's the kernel of the map R[x] --> C that maps x to λ? Is it surjective? Know any theorems about homomorphisms?
 
The polynomial [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] is irreducible over [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] since if the polynomial was reducible it would have a linear factor in [itex]\mathbb{R}[x][/itex] and hence a zero in [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]. But the polynomial has no zeroes hence factorization is impossible.

Because of this fact, the quotient ring [itex]\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1)[/itex] is a field.

I now look for isomorphisms that take elements in the quotient ring to elements of the complex numbers.

[tex]\phi : \mathbb{R}[x]/(x^2-x+1) \rightarrow \mathbb{C}[/tex]

An element in the quotient ring will be of the form [itex](a+bx)[/itex], where [itex]x[/itex] is a solution to [itex]x^2-x+1=0[/itex]. And an element of the complex numbers will be of the form [itex](a+b\lambda)[/itex] where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is a solution to [itex]\lambda^2-\lambda+1=0[/itex].

Now [itex]\phi[/itex] is an isomorphism if it is a homomorphism with respect to addition and multiplication. That is

[tex]\phi(a+b) = \phi(a') + \phi(b')[/tex]
[tex]\phi(ab) = \phi(a')\phi(b')[/tex]

Where [itex]a,b[/itex] are elements of the quotient ring and [itex]a',b'[/itex] are elements of the complex numbers.

The kernel of this map is that element of the quotient ring which maps to [itex]0 \in \mathbb{C}[/itex]. That is, [itex]\ker{\phi} = x[/itex] where [itex]x[/itex] is the solution to [itex]x^2-x+1=0[/itex].

Im not sure if all this so far is necessary to show an isomorphism exists, but I wrote this just to make sure my reasoning is correct. It probably isn't, but someone can point that one out.


Now it suffices to show that [itex]\phi(ab) = \phi(a')\phi(b')[/itex].

[tex]\phi(ab) = \phi((a+bx)(c+dx))[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad)x + bdx^2)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad)x + bd(x-1))[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad)x + bdx - bd)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(ac + (bc+ad-bd)x + bd)[/tex]

And

[tex]\phi(a')\phi(b') = \phi(a'+b'\lambda)\phi(c'+d'\lambda)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(a'c' + (b'c' + a'd')\lambda + b'd'\lambda^2)[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(a'c' + (b'c' + a'd')\lambda + b'd'(\lambda -1))[/tex]
[tex]= \phi(a'c' + (b'c' + a'd' - b'd')\lambda + b'd')[/tex]

And so [itex]\phi(ab) = \phi(a')\phi(b')[/itex]



Also note that if we divide [itex]bdx^2 + (bc+ad)x + ac[/itex] by [itex]x^2-x+1[/itex] using long division we obtain

[tex]ac + (bc+ad-bd)x + bd = \phi^{-1}\phi(ab)[/tex]

Not sure what all this means though.
 
Last edited:
Solution 2

We are considering the polynomial [itex]x^2+x+1[/itex] in [itex]\mathbb{Z}_2[/itex]. It suffices to show that it has no roots: [itex]\mathbb{Z}_2 = \{0,1\}[/itex]

[tex]0^2+0+1 = 1 \neq 0[/tex]

[tex]1^2+1+1 = 3 \equiv 1 \neq 0[/tex]

Hence it cannot be factored non-trivially. This means that

[tex]\mathbb{Z}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1) = \{a+bx | a,b \in \mathbb{Z}_2\}[/tex]

is a field.

This field has [itex]2^2=4[/itex] elements, namely

[tex]0 + 0x = 0[/tex]
[tex]1 + 0x = 1[/tex]
[tex]0 + 1x = x[/tex]
[tex]1 + 1x = 1+x[/tex]

For example,

[itex](1+x)(1+x) = x^2 + 2x + 1 \equiv (x+1) + 0x + 1 = x + 2 \equiv x[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know if I have done these correctly?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K