Is local gauge invariance limiting pQCD to a specific energy regime?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cinquero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Gauge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of local gauge invariance in quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) and its potential limitations within specific energy regimes. Participants explore the relationship between gauge transformations, the nature of elementary particles, and the conditions under which these properties are recognized or assumed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assumption that elementary particles can be treated as Dirac particles at low energies, suggesting that high energies are necessary to recognize their Dirac nature.
  • Another participant argues that the gauge transformations derived from the Arnowitt-Deser method are indeed 'nice' and that high energies are not required to identify an electron, emphasizing the importance of measuring spin and testing parity invariance.
  • A different viewpoint is presented regarding the characterization of the electron as a point-like particle, with a challenge to the notion that it can be defined as such in a classical sense.
  • There is a mention of the necessity for short wavelengths to achieve high resolution in measurements, which relates to the discussion of form factors and the nature of particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of gauge transformations and the recognition of elementary particles, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of gauge invariance and its implications for particle physics, as well as the limitations of measuring properties of particles in finite volumes.

Cinquero
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Could someone please give me some references or the name of the theory for gauge theories using 'nice' gauge transformations, eg. transformations whose first derivatives in space are bounded?

Why I ask that: my question is if we shouldn't take essential properties of quantum mechanics more serious. If we need high energies to recognize elementary particles as dirac particles, why do we assume them to be dirac particles at low energies? My idea is that analytical properties of the gauge transformations represent the dirac nature of particles (local charge conservation in contrast to global charge conservation). Could it be that this prejudice (of local gauge invariance) limits pQCD to the regime of large Q^2? What happens if we weaken local gauge invariance somewhat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see why the gauge transformations for the spinor fields one gets using the Arnowitt-Deser method (so called 'Noether procedure') are not 'nice'.
We don't need high energies to recognize an electron.We have to measure its spin and to test invariance to parity to assess a Dirac field to it.

Daniel.
 
I rather thought of the point-like characterization of the electron in space.
 
There's no such thing...It is considered a point particle,however,all we can measure is the probability of finding it within a certain finite volume in the real space (or configurations space,if we measure the momentum/energy as well).

Daniel.
 
Yes. And in general you need short wavelengths for high resolution... (form factors...)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K