Calculating Speed of 4kg Block using Energy Methods

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a 4 kg block using energy methods in a system involving a pulley. The problem includes considerations of potential and kinetic energy, as well as the moment of inertia of the pulley.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate energy equations to use, questioning the inclusion of both translational and rotational kinetic energy in the calculations. There are inquiries about relating the rotational speed of the pulley to the translational speed of the masses involved.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided guidance on the correct formulation of the energy equation and the relationship between translational and rotational speeds. There is an ongoing exploration of how to account for the kinetic energy of both masses in the system.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the initial potential energy of the falling mass and the need to consider the kinetic energy contributions from both the pulley and the masses as they fall. There is a focus on ensuring all forms of energy are accounted for in the calculations.

kitz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm having a bit of trouble finding the right equation for this:

The pulley in the figure has radius 0.160 m and a moment of inertia 0.480. The rope does not slip on the pulley rim.
Use energy methods to calculate the speed of the 4.00-kg block just before it strikes the floor.

To do this, would the following formula be correct?

[tex]m_{1}gh = 1/2m_{1}v^2 + 1/2I\omega^2 + m_{2}gh[/tex]

The initial energy would just be potential, right? The 2kg block on the floor would have 0 potential energy, and 0 kinetic energy...

I'm getting an answer of 2.9352, is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    6.3 KB · Views: 482
Physics news on Phys.org
kitz said:
To do this, would the following formula be correct?

[tex]m_{1}gh = 1/2m_{1}v^2 + 1/2I\omega^2 + m_{2}gh[/tex]

The initial energy would just be potential, right? The 2kg block on the floor would have 0 potential energy, and 0 kinetic energy...
Yes, the initial energy is entirely PE of [itex]m_1[/itex]. But don't forget that when the mass falls, both masses (and the pulley) will have KE. And you'll need to relate the rotational speed of the pulley to the translational speed of the masses.
 
Thank you sir!

Isn't adding 1/2I*omega^2 relating the rotational and the translational speeds? If not, how do I relate tralsational and rotational to the PE of the 2-kg mass?

Thank you!

Here it is better written:

[tex]m_{1}gh = \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m_{1}v^2 + \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}I\omega^2 + m_{2}gh[/tex]

and in my calculations, I substituted in [tex]\displaystyle{\frac{v}{R}} for \omega[/tex]
 
Last edited:
kitz said:
Isn't adding 1/2I*omega^2 relating the rotational and the translational speeds? If not, how do I relate tralsational and rotational to the PE of the 2-kg mass?
By "relating translational and rotational speeds" I just meant that you need to use [itex]v = \omega R[/itex], which you did.


Here it is better written:

[tex]m_{1}gh = \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m_{1}v^2 + \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}I\omega^2 + m_{2}gh[/tex]
What about the kinetic energy of [itex]m_2[/itex]?
 
would that just be:

[tex]m_{1}gh = \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m_{1}v^2 + \displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}I\omega^2 + m_{2}gh+\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}m_{2}v^2[/tex]
 
That's the one.
 
Thank you very much!

After plugging the numbers in, I got 2.814


Thank you, sir!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K