A budweiser beer (the phase operator)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beer Operator Phase
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Phase operator, which is conjugate to the number operator in quantum mechanics, as highlighted by R. F. Streater in his work. The conversation references Streater's "Lost Causes" and its implications for the application of mathematical concepts in quantum theory. A key argument presented is that phase can be viewed as a component of position information, which preserves phase coherence during wave function reductions. This perspective challenges traditional views of wave-particle duality and suggests new avenues for understanding quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave function and probability waves
  • Knowledge of the Phase operator and number operator
  • Basic grasp of Bohm's theory in quantum chemistry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Phase operator in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of wave function reduction in quantum theory
  • Investigate Bohm's theory applications in molecular dynamics simulations
  • Learn about the concept of hidden dimensions in quantum physics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students interested in advanced quantum theories and their applications.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
203
R. F. Streater lists Phase, the operator conjugate to the number operator as his http://www.mth.kcl.ac.uk/~streater/lostcauses.html#VIII .

I have found recently a curious historical report of this cause: hep-th/9304036, and its prottagonists are intriguing as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found Streater's "Lost Causes" website quite amusing, particularly because I am interested in a number of the topics that he mentions. However, it is good to know that lost causes can be regained http://www.mth.kcl.ac.uk/~streater/regainedcauses.html#III .

Generally, I agree that most of the things he mentions are not of much use for the purposes they were originally invented for. However, the trick in regaining lost causes is to find new applications for the math, where the foundational issues are not relevant. For example, variants of Bohm's theory has been used by quantum chemists for numerical simulations of molecular dynamics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hate to see the discussion of the phase operator drift off the top page. So I'll stir the pot up a little.

There's a subtle argument for considering phase in quantum mechanics as being a sort of position information. The argument goes as follows:

Since we don't see any Schoredinger cats, we intuitively expect that objects must undergo some sort of reduction in their wave function that reduces them to a position.

Phase is necessary for probability waves to interfere. So without phase we will lose interference.

Naively, we would expect that random reductions of the wave functions by a position operator would destroy phase coherence, and we would expect to see Schroedinger's (or whatever) wave equation fail over long distances. But experiments don't detect these.

If we consider phase as a part of the position data, so that a position operator has to reduce a wave function to a point in space and a phase (rather than just reduce a wave function to a point in space), then random reductions of a wave function will not eliminate phase coherence.

Now if there is a small circular hidden dimension, then you can argue that the phase would correspond to position in that dimension. Then it would be very natural that phase should be included with the rest of the position information.

It's not a complete explanation, but at least it gets us one step closer to avoiding having to believe in a wave particle duality that borders on Zen.

Carl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K