Redesigning the Desktop: What Changes Would You Make?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dduardo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Desktop
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on redesigning the desktop interface, emphasizing a console-first approach for all programs, with the GUI serving merely as a frontend. Key suggestions include implementing a consistent programming toolkit, adopting an object-oriented scripting language, and replacing traditional directory structures with relational databases. Participants advocate for enhanced search capabilities, automatic window management, and customizable interfaces that support various input methods, including touch and voice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of console programming and GUI frameworks
  • Familiarity with object-oriented programming concepts
  • Knowledge of relational database structures
  • Experience with user interface design principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research console-based application development techniques
  • Explore object-oriented scripting languages and their applications
  • Learn about relational database management systems and their integration with desktop environments
  • Investigate user interface customization options in modern operating systems
USEFUL FOR

Software developers, UI/UX designers, system architects, and anyone interested in innovative desktop interface design and user experience optimization.

dduardo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
3
If you could redesign the current desktop interface, how would you change it?

These are my suggestions:

1) All programs must be designed for the console. The GUI is simply a frontend to the console program.

2) Consistent programming toolkit.

3) Object oriented scripting language

4) Replace directory structure with relational database.

5) Web, Email, Messaging, File, Collaboration Servers. Make is easy for people to share information.

6) Search Search Search! No more are the days of keeping your files organized. Let the computer handle that.

7) Easy to modify programs or add features to existing programs.

8) Scalable vector graphics for everything.

9) Right Click Program Menu

10) Extensive Keyboard Shortcuts

11) No start menu

12) Expose type task switching

13) Automatic window uncluttering. Software automatically optimizes program real estate to screen resolution

14) Vertical hidden taskbar centered on right and left. No window bar buttons (minimize, expand, close). Drag window to taskbar to minimize. Double left click for rollup. Righ click to close.

15) No desktop icons
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
1) I disagree. We live in a day and age where GUI's are available and should be used when most effecient. Sometimes it is easier to type a few lines and be done with a task; however, I would never go so far as to say all programs must be designed for the console.

2) Yes---but getting this would be like herding cats. Some people like Aqua, some like QT some like GTK some like MFC... How do we go about saying "use this tool kit" when so many exist with different means of accessing the API's. Me, I dislike OOP, so I tend to program in Carbon, and GTK. Others like OOP so they probably lean toward QT, Cocoa, MFC, etc.

3) Meh, take it or leave it. What we need is a natural programming language:

Code:
computer open iCal at midnight every night, except Saturday, and e-mail me all important events

That is where scripting needs to go IMO. Maybe not that loose but in that direction.

4) Agreed

5) Agreed

6) I use this already to an extent. OS X 10.4 is pretty good in this regard.

7) Open source...

8) I'd like to see PDF's as native formats on all systems also.

9) Enlightenment

10) Enlightenment/OS X---I think Windows users would have a fit if they had to resort to keyboard shortcuts. ;)

11) Enlightenment. As an aside, I wish Apple would loose the bar across the top of the screen also.

12) OS X

13) This would be nice, but you run the risk of outsmarting your users and hiding windows the user wanted... This would be tough to do in a manner acceptible to a lot of people.

14) No opinion.

15) Why have a desktop?

This looks promising http://www.symphonyos.com/

And for those who don't know why I kept responding with Enlightenment:
http://www.enlightenment.org/
 
http://mrl.nyu.edu/projects/zui/ has interersting idea for the managing windows... zooming.
(Some implementations:
http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/experiments/pocketweb/
http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/pad++/.
Look at the Fisheye Calendar on http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/piccolo/play/index.shtml ...
The presentation tool is also neat... hover near the bottom of the slide.
In addition, look at the bottom of http://rchi.raskincenter.org/aboutarchy/demos.html
)

There are other interesting ideas on http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/

I think the GUI should be fully customizable.
In addition to keyboard and mouse interfaces, it should also support a stylus and/or touch-screen, gestures, and voice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K