Complex Integral: Existence of Formula for 𝑒^(-𝑎𝑥2+𝑏𝑥)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of formulas for the integrals of the form \(\int_0^\infty e^{-ax^2+bx} dx\) and \(\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ax^2+bx} dx\), where \(a\) and \(b\) may be complex. Participants explore potential methods for evaluating these integrals, including numerical and closed-form solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the first integral can be transformed into an error function (erf) integral, which may only be evaluated numerically.
  • Others argue that the second integral has a closed-form solution related to the Gaussian integral, specifically \(\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ax^2} dx = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}\).
  • A participant suggests completing the square for the quadratic in the exponent to facilitate evaluation of the integrals.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between closed-form solutions and numerical evaluations, with some noting that both can be valid depending on context.
  • One participant emphasizes that while the first integral involves the erf function, it is still considered a closed form, and questions the relevance of distinguishing between closed-form and numerical solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the solutions for the integrals, with some asserting the presence of closed-form solutions and others emphasizing the numerical aspects. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these distinctions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of the parameters \(a\) and \(b\), and the potential dependence on specific definitions of closed-form solutions versus numerical evaluations. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, particularly in the context of transforming the integrals.

Yegor
Messages
147
Reaction score
2
[tex]\int_0^\infty e^{-ax^2+bx} dx[/tex], a and b may be complex.
Does exist any formula for this integral?
Or for [tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ax^2+bx} dx[/tex]?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: M4RC
Physics news on Phys.org
ax2-bx=a(x-b/2a)2+(b/2)2/a

Your first integral then becomes an erf integral, which can only be done numerically. The second integral has a closed form solution - integral of Gaussian.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: M4RC
Yegor said:
[tex]\int_0^\infty e^{-ax^2+bx} dx[/tex], a and b may be complex.
Does exist any formula for this integral?
Or for [tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ax^2+bx} dx[/tex]?
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ax^2} dx={\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}}}[/tex]
Consider your integral multiply it by a constant of the form exp(c) where c let's you conplete the square of the quadratic. Then observe
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-x^2} dx=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-(x+y)^2} dx[/tex]
for any constant y
 
Last edited:
mathman said:
ax2-bx=a(x-b/2a)2+(b/2)2/a

Your first integral then becomes an erf integral, which can only be done numerically. The second integral has a closed form solution - integral of Gaussian.
It is true that the first will involve erf, while the second will have nicer form. Yet erf is a closed form. Also closed form verses numerical solution is kind of silly any way. log(2) is a closed form, but if you want a number you have to "do it numerically". The issue has more do do with how many function one want to define tabulate and use. The distinction between an answer erf(1) and one of sin(1) is mostly historical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K