Can Loll's Team Extend Sum Over Topologies to Higher Dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Loll and Westra's research on extending the sum over topologies to higher dimensions, specifically 3D and 4D, has garnered mixed opinions within the forum. While some participants believe that the extension is feasible, others argue that the sum will become unmanageable in dimensions greater than 2. Their recent paper, "Reconstructing the Universe," suggests that 4D spacetime may exhibit 2D-like behavior at microscopic scales, potentially allowing for controlled topological variations. This breakthrough could significantly enhance our understanding of quantum gravity and the universe's structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum gravity principles
  • Familiarity with path integrals in theoretical physics
  • Knowledge of topological concepts in spacetime
  • Awareness of Loll and Westra's previous research papers
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Loll and Westra's paper "Reconstructing the Universe" for insights on 4D spacetime behavior
  • Explore the implications of Catalan numbers in quantum gravity research
  • Investigate the concept of causal structures in higher-dimensional spacetimes
  • Study the existing literature on sum over histories and path integrals in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students interested in advanced concepts of spacetime topology and path integrals.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
I just had a hopeful thought, actually it was last night on the couch but it was already bedtime.

this is about this thread
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81626
which so far has these results:

---who forecasts what, on the question of---
Will Loll etc be able to extend sum over topologies to dim > 2?

Spin Network: No, 2D is the max. Sum will blow up in higher dimension

Arivero: Yes for 3D but not 4D.

Meteor, selfAdjoint, Chronos, and I: Yes they will extend their result to 4D spacetime path integral.
---that's all so far---

It is really great that, at least in 2D spacetime, Loll Westra managed to include brief microscopic topological variation in their path integral. But there is so much MORE possible topo variation in 3D and 4D that I cannot see how they could include it in those higherdimension cases without the sum blowing up.

BUT WAIT! Their recent paper "Reconstructing the Universe"
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0505154
provided some evidence that our 4D spacetime, at very microscopic scale, MAY ACT LIKE IT IS 2D !

so the topo variation in 4D, as long as you keep it brief and microscopic and causally harmless, as they do in their recent 2D paper, may actually be
controllable down at that tiny scale.

because at that tiny scale the universe is acting like a 2D spacetime
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
here is a thread about the Loll Westra sum over topologies papers

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81295

here are their 3 papers

this thread is about these three papers
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0306183
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0309012
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0507012

the latest one, the one this year, I think is elegant. it has that business about how many ways can you pinch a ring, and the answer is the Catalan numbers
that sequence grows only exponentially with the number of points on the ring, and it counts the possible brief small wormholes in a time-slice.
so the wormholes are controlled and you can toss them in with the geometries you are summing over

basically so far Loll CDT does not include topo variation. Its idea is to sum over all possible spacetime GEOMETRIES for some fixed spacetime topology. So the usual CDT "sum over histories" or "path integral" does not include any spacetimes with handles or wormholes or whatever. It usually fixes the topology to be Time Cross the 3-Sphere----that is R x S3---a very usual sort of spacetime. and then makes this huge amplitude weighted average of every possible geometric shape the thing could have.

For me, that seems quite satisfactory, and they can simulate it in a computer and start right away to get results about quantum expectation values of things measured on this path integral "sum over histories". Great. Why worry about including sum over topology?

I don't know. but respected people like Sidney Coleman and Stephen Hawking have been talking about including topo variation for some decades, and John Archibald Wheeler. the elders of the tribe want this. they think nature does it this way.

and maybe tiny topological tangles or zits or dinguses have something to do with where particles come from, but that seems like giddy speculation to me. so apparently one wants to be able to include microscopic topological variation in the quantum spacetime sum. Go for it Loll. Go for it Westra.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
, which is what they know how to sum over.

I am excited by this possibility and hopeful that Loll and her team will be able to extend their sum over topologies to higher dimensions. It would be a major breakthrough in our understanding of quantum gravity and the structure of the universe. And the fact that their recent paper provides evidence that the universe may behave like a 2D spacetime at a microscopic level is a promising sign that this extension may be possible. I can't wait to see what further research and developments will come from this thread and the work of Loll and her team. The potential implications for our understanding of the universe are truly exciting. Here's to hoping for more progress in this fascinating field!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K