What is the substitution for y in ln(x+y) = e^3x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter punjabi_monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation ln(x+y) = e^3x, focusing on implicit differentiation and the substitution for y in the context of finding dy/dx.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore implicit differentiation and the potential to solve for y directly. Some question the necessity of substituting y in the derivative expression, while others suggest that keeping y in terms of both x and y may be preferable.

Discussion Status

There are various approaches being discussed, including direct differentiation and solving for y. Some participants provide insights on the implications of each method, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of not doing the work for others and the potential pitfalls of solving for y in implicit differentiation.

punjabi_monster
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
hi there i am having trouble on the following question.

1. ln(x+y) = e^3x
(1/x+y)(1+(dy/dx)) = (e^3x)(3)
what can u substititue for y?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
punjabi_monster said:
hi there i am having trouble on 2 quesitons.

1. ln(x+y) = e^3x
(1/x+y)(1+(dy/dx)) = (e^3x)(3)
what can u substititue for y?
I take it you are finding dy/dx by implict differentiation?
[tex]\log(x+y)=e^{3x}[/tex]
differentiation yeilds
[tex]\frac{1+\frac{dy}{dx}}{x+y}=3e^{3x}[/tex]
solving for dy/dx
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=3(x+y)e^{3x}-1[/tex]
observe x+y=exp(exp(3x))
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=3e^{e^{3x}}e^{3x}-1[/tex]
simplify
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=3e^{3x+e^{3x}}-1[/tex]
observe that one could solve the original equation for y and obtain a more straitforward solution.
[tex]\log(x+y)=e^{3x}[/tex]
solve for y
[tex]y=e^{e^{3x}}-x[/tex]
differentiate
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=3e^{e^{3x}}e^{3x}-1[/tex]
 
You're not meant to do people's work for them :/.
 
how do u get e^e^3x
 
By solving the natural log.
 
ok thanks guys.
 
In general, however, when doing an implicit differentiation, it is not necessary nor desirable to solve for y and then substitute that for y in the expression for the derivative. It is better to leave it in terms of both x and y.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
7K