Kirchhoff's Rules, system of equation problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter coile3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Kirchhoff's rules to a DC circuit problem involving the calculation of currents through a system of equations. The original poster describes encountering issues with their equations leading to a dependent system, resulting in an infinite number of solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve a system of equations derived from Kirchhoff's loop rule but encounters difficulties with the matrix solution indicating dependency. They question the necessity of using Kirchhoff's junction rule to obtain a valid equation and whether this is a common requirement in such problems.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of using Kirchhoff's junction rule in conjunction with the loop rule. Some suggest that without the junction rule, the equations may not provide sufficient information to yield a unique solution. There is a recognition that the addition of the junction rule can help clarify the relationships between the currents.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the problem may stem from having fewer linearly independent equations than unknowns, leading to the observed dependency in the system. The discussion reflects on the necessity of including the junction rule to ensure a complete set of equations for solving the circuit problem.

coile3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I came up with three equations, to find three different currents in a DC circuit, using Kirchhoff's loop rule, but when I solved them as a matrix in my calculator the bottom row becomes all zero's and the first two rows do not appear to be in "rref" form. I solved the system of equations by hand and when I add the solution from the first two (my new equation) to the third I get 0=0. Is this because they are dependent? If I use Kirchoffs junction rule to get an additional equation I can substitute the junction equation for any of the original three and get the answers. Should I always use the junction rule to find at least one of my equations, and is this problem due to not having used an equation from the junction rule originally or is it an occasional occurrence and normally using any three equations (following Kirchhoff's rules) will give me the results I need?

thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably, two of the three equations you obtained using the loop rule are equivalent, which means that without the junction rule you don't have enough information to solve the problem.

Essentially, you're trying to solve 2 equations for 3 unknowns, so you get an infinite number of possible solutions. The addition of the junction rule narrows it down to one solution.
 
Thanksl that is exactly what has happened, I get an infinite amount of solutions so, Does that mean I should always use an equation generated by the junction rule?
 
Does that mean I should always use an equation generated by the junction rule?

In these types of problems it is usually necessary, since the currents are related.
 
You MUST use the junction rule (explicitly or implicitly). You will have an insufficient number of linearly independent equations without it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K