Why Must the Universe Expand or Contract According to General Relativity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

General relativity necessitates the expansion or contraction of the Universe due to the interplay of gravitational forces and the distribution of matter and energy. Einstein's introduction of the cosmological constant was an attempt to maintain a static universe, which he later deemed a mistake upon discovering the Universe's actual expansion. The discussion highlights that if the Universe were static, gravitational attraction would cause all matter to clump together, contradicting observed cosmic behavior. Thus, the Universe's dynamics are fundamentally linked to its expansion or contraction based on matter density and energy pressure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the cosmological constant concept
  • Knowledge of gravitational forces and their effects on cosmic structures
  • Basic grasp of the expansion of the Universe and observational cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the cosmological constant in modern cosmology
  • Study the role of dark energy in the expansion of the Universe
  • Explore gravitational dynamics in the context of general relativity
  • Investigate the evidence for the expanding Universe from redshift observations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of cosmology seeking to understand the fundamental principles governing the Universe's expansion and the implications of general relativity.

Symbreak
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
1. In general relativity, why is there a requirement for spacetime, in the context of the Universe, to expand/contract?
It is often said that the theory predicts the Universe to expand, but Einstein missed out on this by adding the 'cosmilogical constant'. But where in the theory is the condition that the Universe must expand/contract?
The only way I can see this condition maintained is if the Universe is bounded - and thus has enough matter to ensure a contraction, or energy pressue to expand, but not remain static.

2. Why doesn't a charge increase (like an electrons charge) with velocity, in the same way as mass? Does not a charge have a kind of inertia, or radiation resistance, so therefore must increase for speeds near c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Symbreak said:
1.

2. Why doesn't a charge increase (like an electrons charge) with velocity, in the same way as mass? Does not a charge have a kind of inertia, or radiation resistance, so therefore must increase for speeds near c?

If two highly charged energetic particles were traveling near c, then their trajectories would be 'Attracted' to 'Opposite' charged particles, thus Gravity would be Electrically Charged Induced? A highly charged Blackhole, say at the core of Galaxies, would cause all finite particles with any sort of charge signature to be attracted inwards, towards the Charge Source, and Particles would never be found outside Galactic Blackholes.
 
1. In general relativity, why is there a requirement for spacetime, in the context of the Universe, to expand/contract?

Gravity is a purely attractive force. If you set up a situation in which nothing in the universe was moving, then immediately all objects would start to fall towards each other, causing the entire universe to "clump".

We don't observe that happening, so there are two possible solutions:
1. There is a "repulsive gravity" which we haven't taken into account, or
2. Galaxies must have started off moving away from each other.

Of course, maybe both of these are true.

It is often said that the theory predicts the Universe to expand, but Einstein missed out on this by adding the 'cosmilogical constant'.

Actually, Einstein added the constant to try to avoid the universe collapsing in his theory, since he knew that we don't see all the galaxies coming towards us. Einstein originally aimed for a "steady state" universe. Then he found out that the universe was actually expanding, and so called the cosmological constant his "biggest blunder".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
650
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
90
Views
14K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K