Which Program to Use for Modeling Gas Turbine Combustor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

For modeling gas turbine combustors, both CFX and FEMLAB are viable options, with each offering distinct advantages. FEMLAB is user-friendly with a modern GUI and does not require programming for mesh generation, making it suitable for simpler models. CFX, on the other hand, is a professional-grade package that excels in handling complex simulations and is comparable in ease for simpler tasks. DYMAIN was mentioned but lacks sufficient recognition in this context, and ABAQUS Explicit is also noted as a potential alternative for dynamic finite element analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
  • Familiarity with FEMLAB and CFX software
  • Knowledge of combustion modeling techniques
  • Basic concepts of mesh generation in simulation software
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the features and capabilities of CFX for gas turbine combustor modeling
  • Explore FEMLAB's GUI and its pre- and post-processing functionalities
  • Investigate academic papers from AIAA on gas turbine combustor modeling
  • Learn about dynamic finite element analysis using ABAQUS Explicit
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, researchers, and students involved in gas turbine design, combustion modeling, and those seeking user-friendly simulation tools.

stan
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
hi

i need to model a gas turbine combustor and i was wondering which tool to use?

is CFX or FEMLAB better? i would like the most straight forward step to achieve this task. Does FEMLAB needs programing to obtain the mesh, which program is more userfriendly?

Btw,has anyone heard of the program DYMAIN? Would it be able to model a combustor as well?

If not, any suggestions on which user friendly program to use?
Any answers to my queries would be welcomed.

Regards,
Stan
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
stan said:
is CFX or FEMLAB better? i would like the most straight forward step to achieve this task. Does FEMLAB needs programing to obtain the mesh, which program is more userfriendly?

Femlab is a complete package, it is more customizable than your traditional FE based package making it a bit more cruder to use in general, but it has a good GUI for pre- & post-processing so you aren't "forced" to write any code to get those stages done. I haven't used CFX but a couple of times but my impression of it is that it is a complete professional package with most the properties you'd be needing. I'd say it depends on the complexity of your approach, a relatively simplistic one I'd do with Femlab, tougher ones CFX will probably handle better (and be comparable in easier ones, Femlabs GUI is pretty modern and quick so doing relatively simple models with it is typically really fast).
 
Possibly FEMLAB and CFX are about the same.

FEMLAB - http://www.comsol.com/products/femlab/

ANSYS - http://www.ansys.com/products/cfx.asp

I don't know anyone who has done a side-by-side comparison.

I haven't used either, but I had a demonstration of CFX back when it was under AEA Technology, and it was one to the two top CFD packages, the other being STAR-CD.

If possible, try to find papers from the utility or aerospace (AIAA) industry on modeling gas turbine combustors. I believe both packages have a combustion or chemistry module.

I have not heard of DYMAIN. Is the spelling correct? There is dynamic FEA, which certainly incorporates different models than static FEA.

My company uses ABAQUS Explicit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K