Genes of a single-celled organism and the genes of a multi-cellular

  • Thread starter Thread starter Therian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genes Organism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the differences between the genes of single-celled organisms and those of multi-cellular organisms, exploring whether genes from single-celled organisms could be utilized in multi-cellular organisms. The scope includes theoretical considerations and biological examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the type of single-celled organism matters, with prokaryotes having DNA free in the cytoplasm and eukaryotes containing DNA in the nucleus.
  • One participant mentions that insulin is produced using plasmids inserted into single-celled organisms, suggesting a practical application of single-celled organism genes.
  • Another participant raises the idea of single-celled organisms that can join together, questioning how their genes might relate to multi-cellular organisms.
  • It is discussed that multi-cellular organisms evolved from single-celled ones, with varying degrees of organization and specialization among different organisms.
  • A participant explains that in multi-cellular organisms, cells are specialized, with different genes being "on" or "off," while single-celled organisms can potentially express all their genes.
  • There is a clarification regarding Volvox, with some participants arguing about its level of specialization, noting that while it has organization, it also exhibits limited specialization among its cells.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the specialization of organisms like Volvox and the implications of gene usage between single-celled and multi-cellular organisms. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the extent of specialization in certain examples or the feasibility of gene transfer.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in defining where single-celled organisms end and multi-cellular ones begin, as well as the complexity of gene expression and specialization in different organisms.

Therian
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between the genes of a single-celled organism and the genes of a multi-cellular organism? I mean could the genes of a single celled organism be used in a certain way in a multi-cellular organism?

Thanks
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It depends on the type of single celled organism. Procaryotes are more primitive and, by definition have their DNA free in the cytoplasm. It is usually in one large circular piece, while smaller circular rings, called plasmids may also be present. Eukaryotes, a class to which all multicellular, and some single celled organisms belong, have the DNA in the nucleus. The DNA works basically the same way in both multicellular and single celled organisms. In fact, insulin for diabetics is now produced by creating a plasmid for the gene that makes insulin and inserting it into single celled organisms. I don't know of an example of a single celled organism's DNA being used in a multicellular organism, but it certainly seems plausible.
 
okay well my friend mentioned a while ago that there were single-celled organisms or something that joined together to form one organism could somebody shed some light about things like those and their genes and whether or not their genes could be used in multi-cellular organisms

Thanks
 
It is true that multi-cellular organisms evolved from single celled ones. It is not easy to say exactly where single celled organisms end and multicellular ones begin. You have organisms which are certainly single celled, like parameciums. Then you have algae that group together in amorphous blobs. Then you have other algae, such as Volvox, which group togerther in sherical colonies. Here there is organisation, but not specialization: all the cells are the same. Then you have an organism like the Hydra which exhibits both organisation and specialization: Some cells are specialized to sting prey, others are specialized as epidermal tissue, etc. In full fleged multicellular organisms, cells are always specialized (with the exception of embryonic stem cells). Eye cells are different from liver cells, which are different from neurons etc.. While all of these cells (with the exception of the gametes) have all of the organisms DNA, various protiens in the nucleus supress or enhance the transcription of different parts of the DNA. This is the difference between different kinds of cells: which genes are "on". This constitutes another difference between sigle and multi-cellular organisms: all of the genes in the one cell of a single celled organism can potentially go "on".
 
LeonhardEuler said:
Then you have other algae, such as Volvox, which group togerther in sherical colonies. Here there is organisation, but not specialization: all the cells are the same.

Volvox might not be the best example of not specialization. Most of the colony has a flagella and are in non-reproductive. A minority has no flagella and the purpose is to reproduce. There is limited specialization in volvox. Volvox could be view as the middle man between no specilization to full specialization and organisation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K