Another Volume of Integration Problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RadiationX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Volume
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a volume integration problem involving a solid defined by specific surfaces in three-dimensional space. Participants explore different methods to set up the integral for calculating the volume of the solid that lies outside the sphere defined by x² + y² + z² = 1 and the paraboloid z = 2x² + 2y² + 2, while being inside the cone z = 4√(x² + y²). The conversation includes attempts to convert the problem into spherical coordinates and cylindrical shells, along with requests for assistance and clarification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on how to approach the volume integration problem, expressing a desire for a complete solution.
  • Another participant questions the bounds of integration, suggesting that they may extend from negative infinity to infinity in the x and y axes.
  • There is a suggestion to use spherical coordinates for the integration, with a focus on converting the given functions into this coordinate system.
  • One participant proposes using cylindrical shells as a simpler method for evaluating the volume, indicating that it could be done analytically with fewer integrals.
  • Another participant provides a detailed conversion of the functions into spherical coordinates, including the derived expression for ρ(φ) and the setup for the volume integral.
  • There is a discussion about the limits of integration for φ based on the geometry of the solid, particularly concerning the cone-shaped function.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the convergence of the derived functions and the appropriateness of the methods suggested.
  • One participant shares Mathematica code used to generate a graph of the functions involved, while also expressing difficulties in converting the graph to spherical coordinates.
  • There are multiple requests for further analytical evaluation of the integrals and clarification on the setup of the volume calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the problem, with some advocating for spherical coordinates and others suggesting cylindrical shells. There is ongoing discussion about the complexity of the methods and the appropriateness of the approaches taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the conversion of functions into spherical coordinates and the evaluation of integrals, indicating potential limitations in their understanding of the methods. The discussion includes various assumptions about the geometry of the solid and the behavior of the functions involved.

RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
let Q be the solid that is outside both [tex]x^2 +y^2 +z^2=1[/tex] and [tex]z=2x^2 +2y^2 +2[/tex], yet inside [tex]z=4\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/tex]

Could someone give me a little jump start on this problem? I would love a complete solution but anyhelp will do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that from negative infinity to infinity in both the x and y axes?
 
the bounds are the different surfaces
 
RadiationX said:
let Q be the solid that is outside both [tex]x^2 +y^2 +z^2=1[/tex] and [tex]z=2x^2 +2y^2 +2[/tex], yet inside [tex]z=4\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/tex]

Could someone give me a little jump start on this problem? I would love a complete solution but anyhelp will do.

The plot is a cross-section with y=0. You want the green right?

What about a triple in spherical coordinates?
Rock and roll.
 

Attachments

  • filled plot.JPG
    filled plot.JPG
    6.7 KB · Views: 472
Last edited:
Yes I need the green part of the graph. SaltyDog, what program did you use to generate that graph?
 
RadiationX said:
Yes I need the green part of the graph. SaltyDog, what program did you use to generate that graph?

Mathematica. Here, this is the code:

Code:
<< Graphics`FilledPlot`
y1[x_] := (1 - x^2)^(1/2);
y2[x_] := 2 x^2 + 2;
y3[x_] := 4 (x^2)^(1/2);
pf1 = Plot[{y1[x], y2[x], y3[x]}, {x, -1, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, {-4, 4}},
     AspectRatio -> 1]
FilledPlot[{y2[x], y1[x], y3[x]}, {x, -1, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-4, 4}, {-4, 4}},
   AspectRatio -> 1]

Of course in Mathematica, you can use real square-roots and exponent symbols. I just used the carrot above so I could cut and paste it here.

However, I'm having problems converting it to spherical coordinates. Maybe you or someone else can do better or perhaps another method can be used.
 
Last edited:
RadiationX, I think I have it but have to evaluate the integral numerically. First of course is to convert the function:

[tex]z=2x^2+2y^2+2\tag{1}[/tex]

into spherical coordinates (you get a quadratic which you can then solve for rho using the quadratic formula but you need to know which sign to use). You can do that. Then integrate rho from the sphere which is 1 up to this function you expressed as [itex]\rho(\phi)[/tex]. Theta of course goes from 0 to 2[itex]\pi[/itex]. Now phi only goes from 0 to that cone-shaped function:<br /> <br /> [tex]z=4\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now, you can figure what the max on [itex]\phi[/itex] has to be from that equation right. Can you then post the expression for [itex]\rho(\phi)[/itex] you determined for (1) above as well as the triple integral?[/itex]
 
Hey RadiationX, I'm affraid I suggested a method more difficult that it needs to be. Cylindrical shells is the simplest approach and the integrals can be evaluated analytically. Just need to split it up into two (single) integrals. Talk about over-kill up there. Can you do this?

You should tell me, "you know Salty, just for recommending that ridiculously complex triple integral up there, you need to spend a lot of time trying to evaluate it analytically, yea, and no Mathematica neither!"

Edit: Hey, I get the same answer for both though so that's encouraging. :smile:
 
Last edited:
thanks Saltydog would you evaluate it a little more analyticlly for me?
hehe
 
  • #10
hello
since iam high concerning in math ,iam looking forward to provide me with math books
(calculus,linear algebra ,abstract algebra,.probpilities,statistics...
evry thing which contains a lot of examples and illustrations
just u can guide me what are the best websites and adresses on the net
iam very thankfu
 
  • #11
RadiationX said:
thanks Saltydog would you evaluate it a little more analyticlly for me?
hehe

Here it is in spherical coordinates:

The relationship between spherical coordinates and cartesian coordinates is:

[tex]x=\rho Sin(\phi) Cos(\theta);\quad y=\rho Sin(\phi) Sin(\theta);\quad z=\rho Cos(\phi)[/tex]

We must first convert the upper function, [itex]z=2x^2+2y^2+2[/itex] to spherical coordinates. Doing this, we obtain:

[tex]\rho Cos(\phi)=2\left[\rho^2 Sin^2(\phi)\left(Cos^2(\theta)+Sin^2(\theta)\left)+1\right][/tex]

Solving for [itex]\rho[/itex]:

[tex]\rho(\phi)=\frac{Cos(\phi)\pm \sqrt{Cos^2(\phi)-16\sin^2(\phi)}}{4Sin^2(\phi)}[/tex]

I'll leave it to others to show that the positive value does not converge in the interval of [itex]\phi[/itex] we are concerned with. Therefore, this function in spherical coordinates is given as:

[tex]\rho(\phi)=\frac{Cos(\phi)-\sqrt{Cos^2(\phi)-16\sin^2(\phi)}}{4Sin^2(\phi)}[/tex]

So [itex]\rho[/itex] will be integrated from the sphere which is 1 up to this function. Now,[itex]\phi[/itex] will be integrated from zero to the function [itex]z=4\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/itex]. It's symmetric about the z-axis. So letting y=0 and just pick a number for z, say z=1, we have 1=4x or x=1/4. Thus:

[tex]\phi_{max}=ArcTan(1/4)[/tex]

We can now set up the integral to determine the volume:

[tex]V=\int_0^{\phi_{max}} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_1^{\rho(\phi)} \rho^2 Sin(\phi)d\rho d\theta d\phi[/tex]

Now, how about setting it up in cylindrical shells?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
thanks saltydog
 
  • #13
Here it is in cylindrical shells:

The diagram below is a cross-section of the region. Consider thin-walled cylinders circling the z-axis (actually y-axis as used here) and split the region of integration into two sections: Section (1) is from x=0 to x=the point where the circle intersects the line y=4x (first vertical line). Region (2) is from that point to the point where y=4x intersects the top curve [itex]y=2x^2+2[/tex] (second line).<br /> <br /> Considering in general the volume of the i'th cylinder as:<br /> <br /> [tex]V_i=\pi r_i^2(f_a(x_i)-f_b(x_i))-\pi r_{i+1}^2(f_a(x_i)-f_b(x_i))[/tex]<br /> <br /> with:<br /> <br /> [tex]x_i=\frac{r_i+r_{i+1}}{2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> and forming the Riemann sum and taking the limit as the partition goes to zero we obtain:<br /> (or just using the formula in the Calculus book)<br /> <br /> [tex]V=V_a+V_b[/tex]<br /> <br /> in which:<br /> <br /> [tex]V_a=2\pi \int_0^a x\left(2x^2+2-\sqrt{1-x^2}\right)dx[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]V_b=2\pi \int_a^b x\left(2x^2+2-4x\right) dx[/tex]<br /> <br /> with:<br /> <br /> [tex]a=\sqrt{\frac{1}{17}}[/tex]<br /> <br /> [tex]b=1[/tex]<br /> <br /> That is:<br /> <br /> [tex] \begin{align*}<br /> V &= \int_0^{\phi_{max}} \int_0^{2\pi} \int_1^{\rho(\phi)} \rho^2 Sin(\phi)d\rho d\theta d\phi \\<br /> &= 2\pi \int_0^a x\left(2x^2+2-\sqrt{1-x^2}\right)dx+2\pi \int_a^b x\left(2x^2+2-4x\right) dx\\<br /> \end{align}[/tex][/itex]
 

Attachments

  • cylindrical shells.JPG
    cylindrical shells.JPG
    8.4 KB · Views: 519

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K