Is Quantum Gravity Simply the Result of Space-Time Curvature?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of quantum gravity and its potential relationship with the curvature of space-time. Participants explore whether the effects observed in quantum mechanics could be attributed to gravitational influences, particularly in the context of particle behavior and wave-particle duality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that quantum gravity might explain the distortion of particles into a quantum mechanical description as a result of gravitational ripples affecting them, questioning the validity of this idea.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on what is meant by the "distortion of particles into the QM description," indicating a need for more precise definitions.
  • A further contribution posits that the wave-like behavior of particles and photons could be influenced by shifting space-time, proposing that gravitational waves might play a role in this phenomenon.
  • Another participant questions whether the significance of these waves would diminish in the absence of gravitation.
  • One participant reflects on their own reasoning, suggesting that experimental evidence could potentially disprove their hypothesis, indicating a willingness to reconsider their stance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views and remains unresolved, with participants exploring different interpretations and implications of quantum gravity and space-time curvature.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and implications of their claims, particularly concerning the relationship between gravitational effects and quantum mechanical behavior. There are indications of missing assumptions and the need for precise experimental conditions to validate or challenge the proposed ideas.

professor
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
i know what it is, and why its searched for...but i have brought myself to a fairly simple answer, and would like to know why it is not a correct one. could quantum gravity not merely state that the reason for the distortion of particles into the qm description (partial-wave) is because of the ripples of gravitation (ie. curved space time). - this seems perfectly reasonable to me... does anyone else see what might be wrong with this ... or is it correct, just not exact enough to be considered fact just yet?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
professor said:
i know what it is, and why its searched for...but i have brought myself to a fairly simple answer, and would like to know why it is not a correct one. could quantum gravity not merely state that the reason for the distortion of particles into the qm description (partial-wave) is because of the ripples of gravitation (ie. curved space time). - this seems perfectly reasonable to me... does anyone else see what might be wrong with this ... or is it correct, just not exact enough to be considered fact just yet?
what do you mean by distortion of particles into the QM description?

marlon
 
i mean the very reason that they are not completely particulate, and that neither is a photon completely wavelike could be because of the shifting of spacetime, therefore making it seem as if these (particles) are indees moving with a partial wave themselves, when rather it is the gravitational waves that affect them in this way
 
aka- without gravitation of any sort... would the waves become less significant?
 
perhaps not... i may see my flaw, if i had a hold of a space station, and some very precese laser fluctuation readers then i could prove myself completely wrong I am willing to bet... ohh well
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K