Optimizing Motion: Calculating Time for Frictional Motion Between Two Blocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter psingh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the time required for two blocks to move a distance of 5.0 m under the influence of friction, starting from rest. The coefficients of static and kinetic friction between the blocks and the floor are provided, and the challenge is to determine the least amount of time for the motion without the top block sliding off the bottom block.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the accelerations of the two blocks and the forces acting on them, including static and kinetic friction. There are attempts to set up equations based on net forces and to use kinematic equations to find time. Some participants question the mass values used in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants are exploring different approaches to the problem, with some providing equations and reasoning while others reflect on their mistakes. Guidance is offered regarding the importance of free-body diagrams and the correct interpretation of forces acting on the blocks.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding mass values and the application of friction coefficients. Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of the physics concepts involved.

psingh
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The coefficient of static friction is 0.60 between the two blocks in figure. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force causes both blocks to cross a distance of 5.0 m, starting from rest.
What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

this is wht i think as long at the two blocks are moving together they have the same acceleration.

bottom box:
x: Ff= ukFn= 0.20*7kg*9.81m/s/s=7*a

top box:
x: Ft-ff= Ft- usFn= 0.60*4*9.81m/s/s=4*a

and then can't you just use the kinematics equation xf=xi+vt+.5at^2
to find the time?
 

Attachments

  • fizzix.jpg
    fizzix.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 1,708
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm--I prefer to keep the static friction coefficients as [itex]\mu _{S,1}[/itex] and [itex]\mu _{S,2}[/itex] until the end, where
[tex]\left\{ \begin{gathered}<br /> \mu _{S,1} = 0.60 \hfill \\<br /> \mu _{S,2} = 0.20 \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} \right\}[/tex]
and [tex]F_{net,1}[/tex] is the net force for the top block, [tex]F_{net,2}[/tex] is the net force for the bottom block. Here's my solution:
[tex]\left\{ \begin{gathered}<br /> F_{net,1} = a \cdot 4.0kg = F_T - 39N\mu _{S,1} \hfill \\<br /> F_{net,2} = a \cdot 3.0kg = 39N\mu _{S,1} - 69N\mu _{S,2} \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} \right\} \Rightarrow[/tex]
[tex]a = \frac{{F_T - 39N\mu _{S,1} }}{{4.0kg}} \Rightarrow[/tex]

[tex]3.0kg\frac{{F_T - 39N\mu _{S,1} }}{{4.0kg}} = 39N\mu _{S,1} - 69N\mu _{S,2} \Rightarrow[/tex]
[tex]\frac{{3.0}}{{4.0}}\left( {F_T - 23N} \right) = 9.6N \Rightarrow F_T = 36N[/tex]
[tex]\therefore a = \frac{{36N - 23N}}{{4.0kg}} = 3.3\frac{m}{{s^2 }}[/tex]

*Because [itex]v_0 = 0 \frac{m}{s}[/itex], and I like to set [itex]x_0 = 0 m[/itex],
[tex]\therefore v = \left( {3.3\frac{m}{{s^2 }}} \right)t \Rightarrow x = 5.0m = \left( {3.3\frac{m}{{s^2 }}} \right)\frac{{t^2 }}{2} \Rightarrow t = 1.7s[/tex]

Is this the correct answer?
 
Last edited:
thanks! ooo i see where i messsed up. on the bottom box for the mass, i made it 7 instead of just 3kg.

thanks a lot!
 
psingh said:
thanks! ooo i see where i messsed up. on the bottom box for the mass, i made it 7 instead of just 3kg.

thanks a lot!

No problem, welcome to PF:smile:
Drawing the free-body diagrams can help tho*

-When you draw it for the bottom mass,
you can draw two weight vectors, and one large normal force opposing
the stacked masses that relates to the friction of the bottom block against the floor...the second mass has its own free-body diagram/properties, its own 3.0kg, unique to the system (rather than just combining into 7.0kg)
 
Last edited:
The easy way to solve for the acceleration is to just consider forces on the bottom block. No matter how hard the rope is pulled, the only force transmitted to the bottom block is that from the static friction between the blocks. Once that force reaches its maximum value ([itex]\mu_2 m_2 g[/itex]) the bottom block will have the maximum acceleration. You can compute the net force on the bottom block ([itex]F_{net} = \mu_2 m_2 g - \mu_1 (m_1 + m_2) g[/itex]) and thus calculate that maximum acceleration. The rest is kinematics.
 
Hmm--I guess I need a better book than Barron's Review! (I never took Physics C, I'm studying from a review book)-->your method is much faster, I agree'''
(So far I took CalcII in school, and have a bunch of Phys B knowledge w/o the math-->so I figured a review book would be faster, though not necessarily better than a real textbook!)
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K