Newton's Laws - finding acceleration of block on sled

In summary: At Ffmax, the block and toboggan are on the verge of movement, but they don't necessarily move together (with the same acceleration) until the force exceeds Ffmax.You could imagine a hypothetical scenario in which the force was increased gradually from 0 N. The blocks will begin to move together at the smallest possible force that exceeds Ffmax. This is the threshold at which the kinetic friction force first exceeds the static friction force. It is also the threshold at which the block begins to slide relative to the sled. (The block may be accelerating relative to the ground, but the sled is accelerating even more.) So it might be useful to think in terms of acceleration, even though the question asks
  • #1
jgray
10
0

Homework Statement



A 4.0 kg toboggan rests on a frictionless icy surface, and a 2.0 kg block rests on top of the toboggan. The coefficient of static friction μs between the block and the surface of the toboggan is 0.58, whereas the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.48. The block is pulled by a horizontal force of 30 N as shown.
a.Calculate the block’s acceleration.
b.Calculate the toboggan’s acceleration
c.If the applied force is gradually reduced, at what value do the block and the toboggan have the same acceleration?

Homework Equations



F=ma
Ff = ukFn
Ff = usFn
mb = block's mass
mt = toboggan's mass
Fa = applied force (30N)

The Attempt at a Solution



a. For the block:
Fg = mb = (2)(9.8) = 19.6N
No acceleration in y direction therefore FN = 19.6N

Ff = usFn = (0.58)(19.6N) = 11.37N -- from this I know that the applied force overcomes the max static friction force and the block will indeed move and we need to use kinetic friction. (** Am I correct in including this?)

Ff = ukFn = (0.48)(19.6N) = 9.41N

F=ma = Fa - Ff= ma
30N- 9.41N = 2a
a= 10.30 m/s^2, to the left

b. F= mta =
Ff = mta
9.41N = 4a
a=2.35 m/s^2, also to the left (** Am i correct to use the frictional force of the block here?)

c. F(toboggan) = mta
= 9.41N/4kg
=2.35 m/s^2
Since it is the applied force that is decreasing, I have to get the acceleration of the block to 2.35m/s^2.
F(block)=mba
Fa-Ff=mba
F-9.41=(2kg)(2.35m/s^2)
F= 14.11N

Just looking to get some advice as to if I'm going through this correctly! It confused me when giving me both the static and kinetic coefficient of frictions, and looking online it seems like everyone was doing this question differently. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jgray said:
Ff = usFn = (0.58)(19.6N) = 11.37N -- from this I know that the applied force overcomes the max static friction force and the block will indeed move and we need to use kinetic friction. (** Am I correct in including this?)
You'll need to rethink your reasoning. Hint: If the two blocks are were to move together, what kind of friction would act between their surfaces? What acceleration would they have? What force would the block have to exert on the sled? Is static friction enough? (Your reasoning would make sense if the sled were fixed to the ground. But it's not.)

Ff = ukFn = (0.48)(19.6N) = 9.41N

F=ma = Fa - Ff= ma
30N- 9.41N = 2a
a= 10.30 m/s^2, to the left
OK.

b. F= mta =
Ff = mta
9.41N = 4a
a=2.35 m/s^2, also to the left (** Am i correct to use the frictional force of the block here?)
OK.

c. F(toboggan) = mta
= 9.41N/4kg
=2.35 m/s^2
Since it is the applied force that is decreasing, I have to get the acceleration of the block to 2.35m/s^2.
F(block)=mba
Fa-Ff=mba
F-9.41=(2kg)(2.35m/s^2)
F= 14.11N
What's the maximum force that the block can exert on the sled so that they still move together? Compare with the reasoning outlined above.
 
  • #3
You have done first two questions correctly- but not the third.

For the third question, you can't fix the acceleration as 2.35[itex] m/s^{2}[\itex]. Since the force changes, acceleration will also change.And friction also changes from kinetic to static. So you have to assume an acceleration 'a' which will be common to both toboggan and the block.

Now, there are two variables 'F' (force at which the accelerations become equal) and 'a'. Make two equations and solve them.

Best of luck!
Write to me if you have any question-Happy to help you!
Regards
ADI
 
  • #4
jgray said:
c.If the applied force is gradually reduced, at what value do the block and the toboggan have the same acceleration?
This question strikes me as ambiguous. Are we to imagine multiple trials, from rest, with a slightly smaller force in each trial, or is there a single trial in which the force is gradually reduced while the system is moving? I would guess it's the first, and other responders seem to agree, but it is not clear.
 
  • #5
I'm currently working on this question myself.

part a). for the block I used the calculation ∑F = 30N - Ff = 30N - (0.48)(19.6) = 20.6 N, then a = 20.6 N / 2.0 kg = 10.3 m/s^2 to the left

part b). for the acceleration of the sled i used the calculation Ff = ma, since there is no other horizontal force on the toboggan.
Ff = ma , a = (19.6 N)(.48) / 4.0 kg = 2.4 m/s^2 to the left

these values seemed to agree with that had been done before.

Part c. is what confuses me. It's not asking for an acceleration, to me the questions is asking for a force that would allow the block and toboggan to move together. Wouldn't this just be when Ffmax = μsFn = (0.58)(19.6N) = 11.4 N? At the Ffmax, the block and toboggan will be on the verge of movement. If we applied a force of 11.400000000000001 N we would have exceeded the static force of friction and then the block and toboggan would switch to a kinetic force of friction and move nearly together? So i would say a force of 11.4 N would be the force that would allow the block and toboggan to move together at the same acceleration.
 
  • #6
SteveS said:
Part c. is what confuses me. It's not asking for an acceleration, to me the questions is asking for a force that would allow the block and toboggan to move together.
Right. But calculating the acceleration might be a useful step towards the answer.

SteveS said:
Wouldn't this just be when Ffmax = μsFn = (0.58)(19.6N) = 11.4 N?
Yes.

SteveS said:
At the Ffmax, the block and toboggan will be on the verge of movement. If we applied a force of 11.400000000000001 N we would have exceeded the static force of friction and then the block and toboggan would switch to a kinetic force of friction and move nearly together? So i would say a force of 11.4 N would be the force that would allow the block and toboggan to move together at the same acceleration.
Careful! You need to figure out what applied force would allow the static friction to max out, but it's not simply equal to the friction force. (Think about it: If the applied force equaled the max static friction, then wouldn't it the block be in equilibrium? Does that make sense?)

Hint: What's the acceleration?
 
  • #7
Ok, taking a look at the acceleration then, since as previously mentioned, to keep the box from sliding the Ffmax = μsFn = ma

The Fn exerted by the toboggan on the box is Fn = mg.

substituting into the previous equation, we get

μs mg = ma, the masses will cancel and we get a = μsg = (0.58)(9.80 m/s^2) = 5.7 m/s^2

using this as the acceleration of the combined mass of the toboggan and box would be F = ma = (6.0 kg)(5.7m/s^2) = 34 N

This value of 34 N seems rather illogical based on the initial 30 N that was given in the question producing such different values for a in parts a and b.

The question states that applied force would be reduced so you would already have passed from static friction to kinetic friction, as you decelerate, would it be possible for the force applied to be less than the static force because the μk is lower than the μs?

I'm thinking that I could return my value for acceleration back to the equation for the box used in part a, replacing the 30 N with the variable Fp.

ΣF = Fp - (.48)(19.6 N) = ma

That would make it Fp = (2.0kg)(5.7 m/s^2) + (.48)(19.6N) = 21 N. This makes much more sense as it would be less than the 30N originally applied to the system.
 
  • #8
SteveS said:
μs mg = ma, the masses will cancel and we get a = μsg = (0.58)(9.80 m/s^2) = 5.7 m/s^2
Is this in respect of the box or the toboggan? If the block, you've omitted the applied force; if the toboggan, the two m's are not the same.
 
  • #9
SteveS said:
Ok, taking a look at the acceleration then, since as previously mentioned, to keep the box from sliding the Ffmax = μsFn = ma

The Fn exerted by the toboggan on the box is Fn = mg.

substituting into the previous equation, we get

μs mg = ma, the masses will cancel and we get a = μsg = (0.58)(9.80 m/s^2) = 5.7 m/s^2
As haruspex has already noted, you are mixing up the masses.

Hint: Deal with the toboggan first.
 
  • #10
Ah yes, the Fn uses the mass of the box not the sled so they won't cancel out.

Ok so it should have been:

a = (0.58)(19.6N) / (4.0 kg) = 2.8 m/s^2 for the acceleration of the toboggan.

then going back to the box using the same acceleration;

Fp = (2.0 kg)(2.8 m/s^2) + (0.48)(19.6N) = 15 N

Have I finally got it? I was seriously laying in bed last night for about an hour turning this problem around in my mind.
 
  • #11
SteveS said:
Fp = (2.0 kg)(2.8 m/s^2) + (0.48)(19.6N) = 15 N
Why are you using the kinetic coefficient here? The frictional forces as experienced by the two bodies must be equal and opposite.
 
  • #12
I used the kinetic coefficient here, because I was thinking about what my text said about once over coming the static force you then us the kinetic coefficient. However, looking at it makes sense when i look at my previous work. I need x amount of energy to reach Ffmax and then the energy to accelerate the 2.0kg box at the same acceleration as the toboggan.

so it should then be

Fp = (2.0 kg)(2.8 m/s^2) + (0.58)(19.6N) = 17 N
 
  • #13
SteveS said:
I used the kinetic coefficient here, because I was thinking about what my text said about once over coming the static force you then us the kinetic coefficient. However, looking at it makes sense when i look at my previous work. I need x amount of energy to reach Ffmax and then the energy to accelerate the 2.0kg box at the same acceleration as the toboggan.

so it should then be

Fp = (2.0 kg)(2.8 m/s^2) + (0.58)(19.6N) = 17 N
Yes.

You can get there a bit faster by first looking at the whole system: a = F/(4.0+2.0).
Now considering the top mass only, a = (F-(2.0)(0.58)g)/2.0
 

Related to Newton's Laws - finding acceleration of block on sled

1. How do Newton's laws apply to finding the acceleration of a block on a sled?

Newton's laws of motion can be used to determine the acceleration of a block on a sled by looking at the forces acting on the block. The first law states that an object will remain at rest or in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on it and inversely proportional to its mass. The third law states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. By analyzing the forces acting on the block and applying these laws, the acceleration of the block on the sled can be determined.

2. What is the difference between mass and weight when using Newton's laws to find acceleration?

Mass and weight are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same. Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, while weight is a measure of the force of gravity acting on an object. When using Newton's laws to find acceleration, mass is used in the equation to determine the acceleration, not weight. This is because weight can vary depending on the strength of gravity, while mass remains constant.

3. Can Newton's laws be applied to a block on a sled on an incline?

Yes, Newton's laws can still be applied to a block on a sled on an incline. The force of gravity acting on the block will need to be broken down into its components, one parallel to the incline and one perpendicular to the incline. The parallel component will contribute to the acceleration of the block, while the perpendicular component will be balanced by the normal force from the incline.

4. What other factors besides force and mass can affect the acceleration of a block on a sled?

In addition to force and mass, the coefficient of friction between the block and the sled, as well as air resistance, can also affect the acceleration of the block. These factors can be taken into account by adjusting the net force acting on the block in the second law equation.

5. Are there real-life applications of Newton's laws in finding the acceleration of a block on a sled?

Yes, there are many real-life applications of Newton's laws in finding the acceleration of a block on a sled. For example, engineers can use these principles to design roller coasters and other amusement park rides, where the acceleration of the ride must be carefully calculated to ensure the safety and enjoyment of riders. Newton's laws also play a role in sports, such as bobsledding and skiing, where acceleration and forces are important factors in achieving success.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
991
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
439
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top