Rotational Collision: Mass, Radius & KE Lost

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two disks with different masses and radii, where one disk is initially rotating and the other is not. The scenario describes a collision where friction causes the disks to reach a common rotational speed after contact. The task is to determine the kinetic energy lost due to this frictional interaction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of kinetic energy for both disks, questioning the use of common angular velocity and the correct moment of inertia for the disks. There are inquiries about the conversion of rotational speeds from rpm to radians per second and the implications of friction on the final speeds of the disks.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the calculations and clarified the use of common rotational speed. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the interaction between the two disks and the effects of friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings about the rotational dynamics involved, particularly regarding the moment of inertia and the interpretation of the problem statement related to friction and rotational speeds.

huskydc
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A disk of mass M1 = 350 g and radius R1 = 10 cm rotates about its symmetry axis at finitial = 152 rpm. A second disk of mass M2 = 247 g and radius R2 = 5 cm, initially not rotating, is dropped on top of the first. Frictional forces act to bring the two disks to a common rotational speed f(final).

I already found f(final) to 129.2 rpm.

next the problem ask for the amount of Kinetic energy lost due to friction.

so i subtract initial KE from final KE to get the change in KE.

did i approach this wrong? b/c i kept getting the wrong answers...and all the numbers i got were pretty big...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK. Show how you calculated the KE.
 
The two masses rotate, when in final contact, at different angular velocities.

You didn't use the same (common) angular velocity for both , did you?
 
but it says that friction brings the two disks to a common rotational speed final. shouldn't i be using the same though?
 
Last edited:
huskydc said:
but it says that friction brings the two disks to a common rotational speed final. shouldn't i be using the same though?
For the final KE, of course you should use a common rotational speed (which you've already calculated). And for the initial KE, you would use the given initial rotational speed.

Again: How did you calculate the rotational KE of the disks? (Be sure to use [itex]\omega[/itex] in radians/sec, not rpm.)
 
hold on...it says it's rotating about its symmetry axis, doesn't that make I = 3/2 m r^2?

anyways...if we assume I to be .5 m r^2, i calculate the KE like this:

KE initial = .5 I(1) omega(initial)^2 + .5 I(2) omega(initial)^2
= .5 [.5 m(1) r(1)^2] omega(initial)^2
= .25 m(1) r(1)^2 omega(initial)^2

KE final = .5 I(1) omega(final)^2 + .5 I(2) omega(final)^2
= .25 m(1) r(1)^2 omega(final)^2 + .25 m(1) r(1)^2 omega(final)^2


KE final - KE initial =...

convert rpm to rad/s...and plug in numbers...i get a range of different numbers, big to small..
 
huskydc said:
hold on...it says it's rotating about its symmetry axis, doesn't that make I = 3/2 m r^2?
No. For a disk, [itex]I = 1/2 M R^2[/itex].

anyways...if we assume I to be .5 m r^2, i calculate the KE like this:

KE initial = .5 I(1) omega(initial)^2 + .5 I(2) omega(initial)^2
= .5 [.5 m(1) r(1)^2] omega(initial)^2
= .25 m(1) r(1)^2 omega(initial)^2
Nothing wrong with this.

KE final = .5 I(1) omega(final)^2 + .5 I(2) omega(final)^2
= .25 m(1) r(1)^2 omega(final)^2 + .25 m(1) r(1)^2 omega(final)^2
I assume you meant the second term to be for the second disk: m(2), r(2).


KE final - KE initial =...

convert rpm to rad/s...and plug in numbers...i get a range of different numbers, big to small..
Looks OK to me. How can one method give you a range of answers?
 
huskydc said:
but it says that friction brings the two disks to a common rotational speed final. shouldn't i be using the same though?
OK, I think I figured this out.

huskydc said:
...
Frictional forces act to bring the two disks to a common rotational speed f(final).

..
When I first read this, I interpreted it as meaning that when the two disks came into contact then (kinetic) friction between the disks would start to rotate the disk M2 until the two disks had the same periferal velocity. (At which point rolling friction would take over.) Had that been the case, then ω2 = 2*ω1. I thought the "rotational" bit must be a typo!

Hiowever it seems that in addition to the kinetic friction between the disks, there is also some (internal) friction slowing disk2 down until ω2 = ω1.

My mistake - sorry 'bout that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K