At what speed does the food enter the stomach

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a morsel of food moving through the esophagus into the stomach, focusing on the forces acting on it and the energy concepts involved. The problem involves calculating the final speed of the food as it enters the stomach, considering resistive forces and initial conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between work done by non-conservative forces and changes in kinetic and potential energy. Questions arise about the correct application of energy concepts and the impact of resistive forces on motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to the problem, with some participants suggesting the use of kinematic equations while others emphasize energy conservation principles. There is an acknowledgment of the need for consistent units and clarification on how to apply the equations correctly. No explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the direction of forces and the role of gravitational acceleration, as well as the importance of distinguishing between initial and final velocities in energy calculations.

frozen7
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
A morsel of food with a mass of 4.2g is injected into the esophagus with an initial speed of 2.5cm/s. On the way down to the stomach, the walls of the esophagus exert an upward resistive force of 0.0027 N on the morsel. Ifthe esophagus is 20cm long, with what speed does the morsel of food enter the stomach?

I solve it by :

Wf = 1/2 m (v^2 - u^2) and I got the wrong answer.

Can anyone tell me what`s wrong with it?

I feel very blur with enerygy concept, especially relate with non conservative force. Can anyone summarize the important concept about energy for me? :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see that energy has anything to do with it.

Although you say "down" the gullet, I feel sure you are not assuming the esophagus is not straight up and down and that there is no gravitational acceleration downward!
In that case, the only force on the food is the upward force of 0.0027 N and so the acceleration is 0.0027N/0.0042 kg= 0.64 m/s2= 64.29 cm/s2.

Now use d= (1/2)at2+ v0t and v= at+ v0
with a= 64.29 dm/s2, v0= -2.5 c/s, and d= -20. Solve the first equation for t, the time the food takes to get to the stomach, then use the second equation to find v, the speed of the food at that time.

Having said all of that, I'm going to rethink what I initially said: You can use the mass and initial speed of the food to find its initial kinetic energy. That is decreased by the work the esophagus does on the food: Work= Force*distance= 0.0027 N* 0.20 m. Subtracting that from the initial kinetic energy gives the final kinetic energy of the food: you can find the speed from that.

Be sure to use consistent units! Either meters, kilograms, Newtons, and Joules or cm, grams, dynes, and ergs.
 
I get this equation from my textbook:

Work done by non conservative force = change in KE + change in PE

If I apply this formula in this question, why can't i find the true answer?
 
It appears that you are not using the CHANGE in KE and PE in your original equation. Since the food has an initial velocity and a final velocity, there need to be two terms for the velocity in the KE portion of the equation.

Start by calculating each component of your equation:
WORK: [tex]W_f = F*d[/tex]

KE: [tex]\Delta KE = \frac{1}{2} m ({v_2}^2 - {v_1}^2)[/tex]

PE: [tex]\Delta PE = m*g (h_2 - h_1)[/tex]

You know every component except [tex]v_2[/tex]
 
Last edited:
I got it. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K