Orion1
- 961
- 3
Expired Thread...
Expired Thread...
Expired Thread...
Last edited:
The discussion centers around the reasons behind Euler's choice of the letter 'e' to represent the base of natural logarithms in his mathematical work. Participants explore the implications of naming conventions in mathematics, particularly in relation to egotism and attribution of credit. The conversation touches on historical context and Euler's character.
Participants express differing views on the implications of naming conventions and the motivations behind Euler's choice of 'e'. There is no consensus on the reasons for the choice or the broader implications of naming in mathematics.
Participants reference Euler's historical contributions and the context in which he worked, but there are unresolved questions regarding the motivations behind his notation and the nature of mathematical naming conventions.
the notation e made its first appearance in a letter Euler wrote to Goldbach in 1731. He made various discoveries regarding e in the following years, but it was not until 1748 when Euler published Introductio in Analysin infinitorum that he gave a full treatment of the ideas surrounding e.
Euler gave an approximation for e to 18 decimal places
e = 2.718281828459045235
Tide said:Euler probably chose e for other reasons. He was a very modest man and not at all egotistical (http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/e.html).