Mathematical Induction: Prove Sum of Arithmetic Sequence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the formula for the sum of an arithmetic sequence using the Principle of Mathematical Induction. Participants explore the steps involved in the proof, including the base case and the inductive step, while addressing potential challenges in the reasoning process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 presents the initial question regarding the proof of the sum of an arithmetic sequence.
  • Post 2 suggests a general approach to mathematical induction, indicating the importance of establishing a base case and assuming the statement holds for n-1 or n.
  • Post 3 outlines a detailed proof, including the verification of the base case P(1) and the inductive step from P(n) to P(n+1), showing the algebraic manipulation involved.
  • Post 4 clarifies a specific algebraic step in the proof, explaining how terms were grouped to facilitate the transition to the next line in the proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps required for the proof, but there is some uncertainty regarding the clarity of certain algebraic manipulations. No consensus on the overall approach is explicitly stated.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express difficulty in following the algebraic steps, indicating that the proof may depend on the clarity of the mathematical expressions used.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and individuals interested in mathematical induction, particularly in the context of arithmetic sequences and proofs in mathematics.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Question

Suppose [itex]a,d \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex] and consider the arithmetic sequence [itex]\{a+kd\}_{k\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}}[/itex]. Use the Principle of Mathematical Induction to prove that

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^n a+kd = \frac{1}{2}(n+1)(2a+nd)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[1] try it for the base case(guess its n=1 not n=0 summation starts at 1)
[2] assume it for some n-1 OR n
[3] show that [2] leads to n OR n+1
(depends on if your more comfortable n-1 --> n OR n-->n+1
majority of cases they are the same but sometimes its easier to see one over the other)

I suggest if you want more help that you first show us what you've done first.
 
You're too quick Neurocomp :smile: , I was typing my solution.

Solution

Let [itex]P(n)[/itex] be that statement that

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^n a+kd = \frac{1}{2}(n+1)(2a+nd) \quad \dag[/tex]

1. Show that [itex]P(1)[/itex] is true:

[tex]P(1) = \sum_{k=0}^1 a+kd = (a+0d)+(a+1d) = 2a + d \quad \ddag[/tex]

For [itex]n=1[/itex] the RHS of [itex]\dag[/itex] equals

[tex]\frac{1}{2}(1+1)(2a + 1d) = 2a+d = \ddag[/tex]

2. Assume true for [itex]P(n)[/itex].

3. Prove true for [itex]P(n+1)[/itex]. That is [itex]P(n+1) = \frac{1}{2}(n+2)(2a+(n+1)d)[/itex]:

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{n+1} a+kd &=& \sum_{k=0}^n a+kd + \sum_{k=n+1}^{n+1} a+kd[/tex]
[tex]\quad= \sum_{k=0}^n a+kd + [a + d(n+1)][/tex]
[tex]\quad= \frac{1}{2}(n+1)(2a+nd) + a + d(n+1)[/tex]
[tex]\quad= a(n+1) + a + \frac{1}{2}dn(n+1) + d(n+1)[/tex]
[tex]\quad= a(n+2) + \frac{1}{2}d(n+1)(n+2)[/tex]
[tex]\quad= \frac{1}{2}(n+2)(2a + (n+1)d)[/tex]
[tex]\quad= P(n+1)[/tex]

[tex]\square[/tex]
 
Last edited:
It may be hard to see what I've done in going from

[tex]a(n+2) + a + \frac{1}{2}dn(n+1) + d(n+1)[/tex]

to the next line.

All I've done is group the a and [itex]\frac{1}{2}d(n+1)[/tex]<br /> <br /> So<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{1}{2}dn(n+1) + d(n+1) = \frac{1}{2}\left[dn(n+1) + 2d(n+1)\right][/tex]<br /> [tex]= \frac{1}{2}d\left[n(n+1) + 2(n+1)\right][/tex]<br /> [tex]= \frac{1}{2}d(n+1)\left[n+2\right][/tex][/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K