Kinematics - One Dimension Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves kinematics, specifically focusing on the deceleration of an automobile and the time taken to engage brakes in relation to a speed limit in a school zone. Participants are tasked with determining the maximum speed allowed for a vehicle to stop within a specified distance, considering both reaction time and deceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the breakdown of the problem into segments involving reaction time and deceleration. There are attempts to derive equations for maximum speed and distance covered during reaction time. Some participants express confusion regarding unit conversions and the treatment of time as a variable versus a constant.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided insights into using different equations and methods to approach the problem, while others are still grappling with their calculations and understanding of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a textbook that provides answers without explanations, which may contribute to participants' difficulties in understanding the underlying principles. Additionally, the transition between metric and imperial units is noted as a point of confusion.

antimatter1422
The problem is stated as follows:

A typical automobile has a maximum deceleration of about 7m/s^2; the typical reaction time to engage the brakes is 0.50 s. A school board sets the speed limit in a school zone to meet the condition that all cars should be able to stop in a distance of 4 m.
a) what maximum speed should be allowed for a typical automobile? (Answer = 10.6 m/hr)
b) what fraction of the 4 m is due to the reaction time (Answer = 2.38 m)

* Now i know that part b will be a piece of cake if i get part a. But whenever i do part a (its been several tries...) i get around 13.6 miles per hour, not 10.6.

* Also, it really irks me that i can't figure out these kinematics problems without any help. The book they come from is " Paul A. Tipler physics for scientists and engineers." This book shows the answers, but it doesn't show how they got the answers, so i can't learn how to do them.

* In conclusion, if anyone could point me in the right direction, i'd appreciate it. Also, does anyone know how to learn this stuff so i can do it on my own. I can draw out the situation, so i think i understand it conceptually. Is algebra skills holding me back (like setting the problem up, maybe that's where I am messing up). so should i just try more problems, may b easier so i can work my way up and do problems like these? or go back to the basic concepts?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I've got so far is as follows:

The first .5 s of the 4 m there is no acceleration (reaction time). So the distance of the first part of the 4 m traveled (lets say "x") is Vo/2. (From X = Xo + Vavg*t). The second part is where the acceleration is, and you are going to end up at rest. So the distance of the 2nd part of the 4m (let's say "4-x") is (Vo/2)*(t-.5s). If i re arrange this equation i get x = 4 - ((2Vo*t - Vo)/4). So i can set this x equal to Vo/2. I can simplify to get Vo = 16/(2t+3) , or t = (16 - 3*Vo)/(2Vo). If i go back to where t = .5 s and plug that in, i get Vo = 4 m/s. If i change 4m/s to mi/h, i get 8.948 mi/hr. NOT the right answer. (and I am not sure what i did different, but last time i got 13.67 mi/hr)

- What am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CORRECTION :
Answer to part a) is not 10.6 m/hr. It is 10.6mi /hr
 
Why does it go from using meters, to using miles?
 
i guess to make the problem more realistic., because they are talking about the school zone speed limit (in the usa). but u should be able to just convert ur m/s in the end to mi/hr.
 
moose, if you worked it out, what did you get for you final answer to part a?
 
You error was in treating t as a variable rather than as a constant.
t is the time of the total journey and is fixed.
The eqn "Vo = 16/(2t+3)" is true only for a fixed value of t, not a variable one.

I found it easier to use the suvat eqn,

v² = u² - 2as

and treating it as two separate movements - one at constant speed (for 0.5 s) and the other at constant deceleration.

I got the right answer :)
 
antimatter1422 said:
So the distance of the 2nd part of the 4m (let's say "4-x") is (Vo/2)*(t-.5s).

Okay if x is the dist. traveled before braking then[tex]x = \frac {1}{2} V_o[/tex]

So dist. left to brake => 4 - x = 4 - [tex]\frac {1}{2} V_o[/tex]

If you then substitute this distance into your kinematic equations you should have some joy.

BTW, it helps when reading what people have posted if they don't squeeze all their calculations into one big paragraph.

Hope this helps :smile:
 
thanks

:biggrin: thanks everyone for your help. i got it.
ill remember the paragraph bit for next time :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K