Integral Transforms: Origins & Derivations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins and derivations of various integral transforms, including the Laplace and Fourier transforms. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings, properties, and applications of these transforms within mathematics and physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses curiosity about the origins of integral transforms and seeks resources for their derivation.
  • Another participant defines the Laplace and Fourier transforms, highlighting their properties in transforming differential equations to algebraic forms.
  • A question is raised regarding whether the Laplace transform was discovered accidentally or if there is a formal derivation for it.
  • A suggestion is made to refer to "Mathews & Walker - Mathematical methods of Physics" for further reading.
  • Further elaboration on integral transforms includes the definition of a linear transform and the importance of the kernel in their formulation.
  • Participants discuss the traits of integral transform kernels, including existence/convergence, computability, and operational properties.
  • A detailed explanation is provided on how the Laplace transform can be derived from Taylor series and operational properties, leading to the formulation of the transform.
  • Various types of integral transforms are listed, including variations of the Laplace and Fourier transforms, along with their specific applications and characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the origins of the Laplace transform, with some suggesting it may have been derived from established mathematical principles while others question the nature of its discovery. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of its derivation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the derivations and properties discussed may depend on specific definitions and assumptions, and some mathematical steps remain unresolved.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I am curious about the different integral transforms. I found definitions online, but where did they come from? Does anyone know a good site that shows the derivation / need for the common integral transforms?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The LaPlace transform is an integral transform:
L(f)= \int_0^{\infty}e^{-st}f(t)dt
which has the nice property of transforming (linear) differential equations to algebraic equations.

The Fourier transform:
F(f)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-itx}f(t)dt
is a generalization of Fourier series to infinite intervals.
 
Alright. So take, for instance, the Laplace Transform. Was it stumbled upon by accident, or is there an actual derivation for it?
 
Read "Mathews & Walker - Mathematical methods of Physics"
 
Are there any online resources?

Thanks again.
 
An Integral transform is a linear transform of the form.
L[f(t)]:=\int_a^bK(s,t)f(t)dt
where a and b may be + or - infinity and K is called the kernel.
Integral transform kernels are selected using three main traits.
1. Existence/convergence
For functions under consideration does the transform exist? What about inversion? Do integrals that arise converge? In some cases the definition of integral is expanded using Cauchy principle values or distribution theory.
2. Computability
Can the transform be found analytically or numerically? What about inversion? For instance the Laplace, and Fourier transforms are often computed analytically. Numerical inversion of Laplace transform is difficult. The Hankel and Fourier transforms are often inverted numerically.
3. Operational properties
Do functions operated on by some operator have transforms that are easy to deal with?
In practice not many Transforms are of wide applicability they are
-Laplace transform and variations. Useful for temporal problems.
-Fourier transform and variations. Useful for spatial problems.
-Special transforms. Useful in very limited situations. Things like Greens functions that are often useful for only one specific problem.
apmcavoy said:
Alright. So take, for instance, the Laplace Transform. Was it stumbled upon by accident, or is there an actual derivation for it?
Derivation is I think the wrong choice of words. One can be led to the transform. The first way is as a variation on Taylors series.
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_ne^{-n s}\Delta n
This is Taylors series in a new form that leads the way to the Laplace transform. Delta(n)=1 so it is normaly omited, and normally z is used instead of exp(-s).
Now we allow n to be a sequence rather then just integers
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_ne^{-\lambda_n s}\Delta\lambda_n
this is a Riemann sum so it is natural to take the limit to an integral
\int_0^{\infty}f(t)e^{-st}dt
A similar process leads from the Fourier trig series to the Fourier transform.
\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_ne^{i n s}\Delta n
allow nonintegers
\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} a_ne^{i\lambda_n s}\Delta\lambda_n
Limit to integral
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)e^{ist}dt
We may also be led to the Laplace transform by operational properties. We desire a kernel so that
\int_0^{\infty}K(s,t)f'(t)dt=s\int_0^{\infty}K(s,t)f(t)dt
integration by parts on the left side leads us to
K(s,t)f(t)|_{t=0}^{t=\infty}=\int_0^{\infty}(K'(s,t)+sK(s,t))f(t)dt
the ' notation means t partial
Now we make things simple by requiring the left side to be zero. Thus the right side is zero giving a differential equation
K'(s,t)+sK(s,t)=0
the solution is
K(s,t)=A(s)exp(-s*t)
where A(s) is an abitrary function of s
The standard choice is A(s)=1 to make things nice.
The second most popular choice used in some older work is the p-multiplied form where A(s)=s.
Thus we are again led to the Laplace transform.
Now I will list several transforms they are related to one another, so we really have few. Also there are many more than these, but they are mostly either variations of these, or of quite limited usefulness.
-Laplace transform
-p-multiplied Laplace transform (Laplace multiplies by the variable)
-Bilateral Laplace Transform (Laplace with lower limit -infinity)
-Stiltjes transform (Laplace twice)
-Fourier transform
-Fourier cos transform (real part of fourier)
-Fourier sin transform (imaginary part of fourier)
-Hartley transform (F. cos transform - f. sin transform a Fourier like real transform)
-various Finite range Fourier transforms (any Fourier like transform on a finite interval)
-Hilbert transform (similar to Stiltjes the principle value of a singular integral)
-Hankel transform (involves bessel functions like a Fourier transform for polar coordinates)
-various transforms that are like Fourier for some coordinate system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K