A couple problems with angular momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on three problems involving angular momentum and energy conservation in rolling objects. The first problem involves a ring rolling up an incline, where the correct maximum height calculation is 2.35 m, but an initial distance error was identified. The second problem addresses the angular momentum of a solid disk, where the correct angular momentum is calculated as 2.30 kg m²/s using the formula L = Iω. The third problem discusses the forces on a solid sphere rolling along a track, highlighting the need to include the normal force in the horizontal force component calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and angular momentum
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles in physics
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations for various shapes
  • Ability to analyze forces acting on objects in motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of rolling motion and energy conservation in detail
  • Learn about calculating moment of inertia for different geometric shapes
  • Explore the application of angular momentum in various physical systems
  • Investigate the effects of forces acting on objects in circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of angular momentum and energy conservation in rolling objects.

Nanabit
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I know a couple of these I already asked, but I'm really close and missing something. Could someone help??

1) A ring of mass 2.53 kg, inner radius 6.00 cm, and outer radius 8.00 cm is rolling (without slipping) up an incline plane which makes an angle of = 36.4°. At the moment the ring is at position x = 2.00 m up the plane, its speed is 2.75 m/s. The ring continues up the plane for some additional distance, and then rolls back down. It does not roll off the top end. How far up the plane does it go?

I = (1/2)*M*(R1^2+R2^2) = .01265 kg m^2.
v = rw
2.75 m/s = .08mw
w=34.375 rad/sec

w = omega.

(1/2)mv^2+(1/2)Iw^2 = mgh (I'm setting the initial mgh to zero.)
(1/2)(2.53kg)(2.75m/s)^2 + (1/2)(.01265 kg m^2)(34.38)^2 = (2.53kg)(9.8m/s^2)(sin 36.4)x
x = 1.158 m

initial distance up at the x = 2 mark on the plane is 1.19m.

1.158 + 1.19 = 2.35 m

What's wrong??

2) A uniform solid disk of mass 2.98 kg and radius 0.200 m rotates about a fixed axis perpendicular to its face. Omega = 5.95 rad/sec.
What is the angular momentum when the axis of rotation passes through a point midway between the center and the rim?

I = I(i)+mr^2
I = .355kgm^2+(2.98kg)(.1^2)
I = 2.30 kg m^2 / sec

What's wrong?

3) A solid sphere of mass m and radius r rolls without slipping along the track. The sphere starts from rest with the lowest point of the sphere at height h above the bottom of the loop of radius R, which is much larger than r.

What are the force components on the sphere at the point P if h = 3R?

I got Fx being -20/7mg, and I thought Fy would be -mg but it isn't.

THanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. At first glance, your solution looks good.

initial distance up at the x = 2 mark on the plane is 1.19m.

Is it possible that when they say 2 m up the plane, they mean along the plane (making your final answer 2 + 1.158)?

2. Be careful here. I think you meant to write:

Io = .5*M*R^2 = .0596 kgm^2

I = .5*M*R^2 + Mh^2 = .0596 + 2.98*(.1)^2

andular momentum L = Iω = I*5.95rad/s (=.53 kg m^2/s)

3. Where is point P? Somewhere on the loop? If you get a chance, could you show where your answer came from too?
 


1) In the first problem, it seems like you may have made a calculation error when finding the initial distance up the plane. You calculated it to be 1.19m, but it should be 1.16m (rounded to two significant figures). This could have affected your final answer of 2.35m. Also, you should not set the initial mgh to zero, as this is the potential energy at the starting point and should be included in the total energy equation.

2) In the second problem, you have correctly calculated the moment of inertia, but you have not used it in the calculation of angular momentum. The correct formula for angular momentum is L = Iω, where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity. So the angular momentum in this case would be 2.30 kg m^2/s, not just 2.30 kg m^2/s^2.

3) In the third problem, it seems like you may have forgotten to include the normal force in your calculation for Fx. The normal force is responsible for the horizontal force component, while gravity is responsible for the vertical component. So the correct formula for Fx would be Fx = -20/7mg + N, where N is the normal force. Also, your calculation for Fy is correct, as gravity is the only force acting in the vertical direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
18K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K