Finding the net electrostatic force on particle 1, triangle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net electrostatic force on a particle in a triangular configuration involving multiple charges. Participants are examining the methods used to solve parts of the problem, specifically focusing on the application of Coulomb's law and the geometry of the setup.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the arithmetic and methodology used in solving part A and part B of the problem. There is mention of symmetry in the geometry and whether trigonometry is necessary for the calculations. Some express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches and the need to break down forces into components.

Discussion Status

There are various interpretations of the problem-solving methods, with some participants suggesting alternative approaches that may simplify the calculations. While some guidance has been offered regarding the use of symmetry and the potential for easier methods, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the initial solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is also a focus on ensuring that the calculations align with the principles of electrostatics.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, Did I do the 2nd part of this problem correct? Part B. I boxed in the answer, i think it will just be easier by showing you my drawing so here is the picture -> http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/9340/phsyicss9lb.jpg
thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest that you recheck your arithmetic for part a. The method you used for part b looks OK (it's a bit hard to follow), but it's not the easiest way to get the answer. (You didn't take full advantage of the symmetry of the geometry.)
 
thanks for the reply but I don't see how part A is wrong...
F = [k(q1)(q2)]/r^2;
F = [9.9E9*(45.0E-6)^2]/(2.70)^2 = 2.75 N
 
The Coulomb constant (k) is about 9.0 E9, not 9.9 E9.
 
thanks a lot that woulda sucked!
 
for the second part, i don't even think it's necessary to use trigonometry.

consider point 3 at the origin in R2. put particles 1 and 2 at the appropriate positions in quadrant's 3 & 4. draw your force vectors for each of the forces. add them visually -- they interfere constructively directly in the +y direction. it looks to me like you'd just have to multiply your answer from a by 2, due to the geometry.

i think it's right and a lot easier than breaking it down into components, but it looks fine barring the oofpez business.
 
Last edited:
teclo said:
consider point 3 at the origin in R2. put particles 1 and 2 at the appropriate positions in quadrant's 3 & 4. draw your force vectors for each of the forces. add them visually -- they interfere constructively directly in the +y direction. it looks to me like you'd just have to multiply your answer from a by 2, due to the geometry.
You would multiply the y-component by 2 to get the answer. But you'd still have to use some trig to find the y-component. (The answer to part a is the full force between two charges, not the y-component.)

Note to mr_coffee: This is the approach I would use, since it takes advantage of the symmetry of the problem.
 
(The answer to part a is the full force between two charges, not the y-component.)

So part A isn't correct? I don't see why I would need to break up part A into components if its a straight line. F = [(9E9)(45.0E-6)^2]/(2.70m)^2 = 2.5N
The way I did my part B isn't it also correct though, even though I didn't do it the best of ways? I got a final answer of 4.33N
 
Your solutions are perfectly OK. My only point was that there's an easier way to get part b.
 
  • #10
Oh alright, thanks for the help and i'll keep that in mind the next time! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K