Master Vectors: Canoeing to an Island with Help from Our Experts!

  • Thread starter Thread starter wr1015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a vectors problem involving two canoeists paddling towards an island in a lake. Canoeist 1 is moving at a speed of 1.60 m/s at a 45° angle north of east, while Canoeist 2 starts from a distance of 1.59 km due east of Canoeist 1. The participants are exploring the direction and speed required for Canoeist 2 to reach the island simultaneously with Canoeist 1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the sufficiency of the information provided, noting that the island's location is not specified, which affects Canoeist 2's required direction. Others discuss the geometric relationships involved, referencing a 45-45-90 triangle to analyze Canoeist 1's path and its implications for Canoeist 2's trajectory.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the geometric relationships of the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the need for further clarification regarding the island's location, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of triangles to analyze the situation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of the unspecified location of the island, which is crucial for determining Canoeist 2's direction and speed. The discussion also references the properties of a 45-45-90 triangle and the relationships between the distances involved.

wr1015
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Vectors problem help, please!

Two canoeists start paddling at the same time and head toward a small island in a lake. Canoeist 1 paddles with a speed of 1.60 m/s at an angle of 45° north of east. Canoeist 2 starts on the opposite shore of the lake, a distance d = 1.59 km due east of canoeist 1.

(a) In what direction relative to north must canoeist 2 paddle to reach the island?? the answer in degrees west of north.
(b) What speed must canoeist 2 have if the two canoes are to arrive at the island at the same time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand the problem correctly, there is not enough information. The island could be anywhere in the lake along the line canoeist 1 travels. The direction canoeist 2 travels will depend on exactly where the island is.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
If I understand the problem correctly, there is not enough information. The island could be anywhere in the lake along the line canoeist 1 travels. The direction canoeist 2 travels will depend on exactly where the island is.

yes you are quite right, attached is a picture of the problem above
 

Attachments

  • 04-14alt.gif
    04-14alt.gif
    25.9 KB · Views: 869
Look at canoeist 1's path. There is a 45-45-90 triangle consisting of his path, the x-axis, and the perpendicular from the island. Given one of the sides, you can now find the other 2. Now look at canoeist 2's triangle. Since you know the toal distance along the x-axis is 1.59km, and you know one part of it from the 45-45-90 triangle, you can subtract to get the short leg of canoeist 2's triangle. The angle [itex]\theta[/itex] is congruent to the angle in canoeist 2's triangle between the canoeist's path and the long leg, so you know that [itex]\tan{\theta}=\frac{opp}{adj}[/itex]. Solve for [itex]\theta[/itex]
 
LeonhardEuler said:
Look at canoeist 1's path. There is a 45-45-90 triangle consisting of his path, the x-axis, and the perpendicular from the island. Given one of the sides, you can now find the other 2.

first i would just like to thank you for actually helping me I greatly appreciate it but for some reason I don't think I fully understand your response because I'm assuming you mean that i use pythagorean's theorem for this but how would that work?? because that would be: (1.59km)squared + unknown side squared = hypotenuse (or the path of canoeist 1) squared.
 
wr1015 said:
first i would just like to thank you for actually helping me I greatly appreciate it but for some reason I don't think I fully understand your response because I'm assuming you mean that i use pythagorean's theorem for this but how would that work?? because that would be: (1.59km)squared + unknown side squared = hypotenuse (or the path of canoeist 1) squared.
It's not the pythagorean theorem you're using. A 45-45-90 triangle is an isocelese triangle. This means that the two legs are of equal length. I am looking at the triangle that has it's sides as: 1-the canoeist 1's path, 2-the side labled 1km, 3-the bottom. The fact that the two legs are equal means that the length of the bottom side is also 1km. The total distance along the bottom between the canoers is 1.59km, so the remaining length must be .59. From there, do what I said before to get the angle. Also, once you have that bottom part for canoeist 1's triangle, you can use the pythagorean theorem to find canoeist 1's path length.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
It's not the pythagorean theorem you're using. A 45-45-90 triangle is an isocelese triangle. This means that the two legs are of equal length. I am looking at the triangle that has it's sides as: 1-the canoeist 1's path, 2-the side labled 1km, 3-the bottom. The fact that the two legs are equal means that the length of the bottom side is also 1km. The total distance along the bottom between the canoers is 1.59km, so the remaining length must be .59. From there, do what I said before to get the angle. Also, once you have that bottom part for canoeist 1's triangle, you can use the pythagorean theorem to find canoeist 1's path length.

thank you very much, that helped me greatly
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K