Determining the Density of Turpentine: Archimedes' Principle Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozen7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Archimedes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the density of turpentine using Archimedes' Principle. A solid aluminium cylinder with a density of 2700 kg/m³ has a measured mass of 67g in air and 45g when submerged in turpentine. The correct calculation yields a density of turpentine at 887 kg/m³, while the lecturer's method incorrectly suggests a density of 2699.4 kg/m³, which contradicts the principles of buoyancy. The consensus confirms that the original calculation is accurate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Archimedes' Principle
  • Basic knowledge of density calculations
  • Familiarity with mass and weight concepts
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (grams to kilograms)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Archimedes' Principle in detail
  • Learn about buoyancy and fluid mechanics
  • Explore density calculations for various materials
  • Investigate common laboratory methods for measuring density
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching fluid mechanics, and anyone interested in practical applications of Archimedes' Principle.

frozen7
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
A solid aluminium cylinder with density of 2700 has a measured mass of 67g in air and 45g when immersed in turpentine. Determine the density of turpentine.

I do it in this way:
W = ( 0.067 - 0.045 ) (9.8)
= 0.2156

Volume of aluminium = 0.067 / 2700 = 2.48 x 10-5

0.2156 = (density of turpentine ) (2.48 x 10-5) (9.8)
density of turpentine = 887

However, my lecturer do it in this way:

W = (density of aluminium) (g)(volume of solid)
volume of solid = xxx

W = (density of turpentine) ( g ) ( volume of solid)
density of turpentine = 2699.4

Which solution is correct actually?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think about it ...

By Archimedes' Principle, the upthrust on an object immersed in a fluid is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced.
According to your professor, turps and aluminium have approximately the same density (2699.4 vs 2700)
This would mean that the aluminium would displace approximately its own weight and so would register a weight of almost zero instead of 45 g.

You working out looks fine.

I wonder if your professor equated the weight of the aluminium cylinder with the weight of the turps displaced ?
 
Your solution is correct.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
984
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K