System of Equations Mechanics problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two objects moving along the x-axis, with their positions defined by the equations x_1 = 23.0t and x_2 = -28.0 + 43.0t - 8.0t^2. The goal is to determine the value of x_2 when the objects are nearest to each other.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss solving for t and substituting into the equations, with one participant expressing confusion over a negative result when using the quadratic formula. Others suggest simplifying the problem by minimizing the distance between x_1 and x_2.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem, including suggestions for minimizing the distance between the two objects. There is an acknowledgment of different methods being explored, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexity of the quadratic equation and its implications for the distance between the two objects, indicating potential assumptions about the behavior of the functions involved.

Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
The x-coordinates of two objects moving along the x-axis are given below as a function of time t. [tex]x_1[/tex] and [tex]x_2[/tex] never have the same value. Calculate the value of [tex]x_2[/tex] when the objects are nearest to each other.
[tex]x_1[/tex]= 23.0t
[tex]x_2= -28.0 +43.0t-8.0t^2[/tex]

I solved the first equation for t, and then plugged it into the second one to get [tex]x_2= -28.0 + 43.0( \frac {x_1}{23}) -8.0(\frac {x_1}{23})^2[/tex]

I tried to use the quadratic formula but got a negative number... can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what value did you use for x_2 in your quadratic formula?
it's easier algebra to replace those "x1/23" terms with "t".

This is a relative location question ... what is x2 rel. to x1?
now there's only one equation, one unknown (t).
minimize x2-x1 , by setting t-derivative =0.
 
If you mean you completed the square to find the minimum value of the quadratic then, since that quadratic is equal to x2, you are just finding the minimum value of x2 itself, not where the distance between x1 and x2 is a minimum.

The distance between x1 and x2 is |x1- x2|- that's what you want to minimize.

It's probably simplest to look at x1- x2 and x2- x1 separately.
 
Ok I got it... thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K