Why Do Different Kinematic Formulas Yield Varied Results for MJ's Jump?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dooh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the maximum height of Michael Jordan's jump, given a total air time of 2 seconds and gravitational acceleration of 10 m/s². The initial velocity at takeoff was incorrectly calculated as 2.2 m/s using the formula V_f = V_0 + gt. The correct application of the second formula, y = ½(V_0 + V_f)t, yielded a height of 1.1 meters, which aligns with the estimated maximum jump height of one meter. The discrepancy in results arises from the need for accurate initial velocity input in both formulas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (g = 10 m/s²)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of uniformly accelerated motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations
  • Learn how to calculate initial velocity using V_f = V_0 + gt
  • Explore the implications of time of flight on projectile motion
  • Investigate the effects of gravity on vertical motion in sports science
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, sports scientists, and anyone interested in the mechanics of athletic performance and projectile motion analysis.

Dooh
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
In this problem, it states that Michael Jordan is able to jump and remain in the air for two full seconds from launch to landing. Use that information to calculate the maximun height that such jump would attain. It also says that MJ's jaximum jump height has been estimated at about one meter.

So, the components that were given are:

t = 2.0s
g = 10 m/s² (rounded from 9.8 for simplicity sake)
and we have to calculate y (height)

Since it takes 2 seconds to go up and down, we can assume that the time it takes for MJ to get to the peak of the jump will be 1.0s, therefore we will use:

t = 1.0s instead.

When i tried solving for this problem, i used the formula:

V_f = V_0 + gt --> V_f - gt = V_0 ,

to solve for initial velocity at takeoff, and i got [ V_0 = 2.2 m/s ]

With that, I followed up with the formula:

a) y = (V_0)(t) + ½gt²

and got the answer of: y = -3.8m , which is obviously wrong. So i tried:

b) y = ½(V_0 + V_f)t

and got the answer: y = 1.1m

My questions are:

1) Why do both formulas give different answers when you are using the same set of data to solve for a problem?

2) Why is formula b correct instead of a when gravity plays a role in this yet it was not part of the formula b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dooh said:
When i tried solving for this problem, i used the formula:

V_f = V_0 + gt --> V_f - gt = V_0 ,

to solve for initial velocity at takeoff, and i got [ V_0 = 2.2 m/s ]
Your answer is incorrect. V_0 = gt.
1) Why do both formulas give different answers when you are using the same set of data to solve for a problem?
If you used the correct value for V_0, both formulas would give the same answer. Note that formula (b) relies on V_f being zero, but formula (a) does not.


2) Why is formula b correct instead of a when gravity plays a role in this yet it was not part of the formula b?
Both formulas correctly describe uniformly accelerated motion, but they need the proper data as input.

Question: Are the values given for time and height consistent with each other, given what you know about the laws of physics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
17K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K