How Does Symmetry Affect Integrals in Wave Equations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the impact of symmetry on integrals within the context of wave equations, specifically using d'Alembert's solution for a vibrating string of length L. The conditions for the function g(x), namely g(x) = -g(-x) and g(x) = -g(2L - x), lead to the conclusion that the integral over a symmetric interval results in zero. The participant seeks clarification on changing the limits of integration in their equation, which is essential for further analysis. The suggested approach involves a change of variable, s = s' - 2L, to simplify the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and d'Alembert's solution
  • Knowledge of integral calculus and properties of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with periodic functions and their symmetry properties
  • Experience with variable substitution techniques in integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of periodic functions and their integrals
  • Study the application of d'Alembert's solution in various wave equations
  • Learn about variable substitution methods in integral calculus
  • Investigate the implications of symmetry in physical wave phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on wave mechanics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical properties of integrals in wave equations.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Of the partial kind

We have just finished solving the one dimensional wave equation for a vibrating string of length L using d'Alembert's solution which is

[tex]u(x,t) = \frac{1}{2} \displaystyle{[} f(x+ct) + f(x-ct) \displaystyle{]} + \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(s) ds[/tex]

the question is
If g(x) satisifes the conditions taht g(x) = -g(-x) and g(x) = -g(2l -x) then
[tex]\int_{x}^{x+2l} g(s) ds = 0[/tex]
Well according to a theorem when a periodic function is integrated over a symmetric interval is zero. Also since the velocity of the wave is ct then ct = 2L

[tex]\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(s) ds = 0[/tex]
[tex]\int_{x-ct}^{x} g(s) ds + \int_{x}^{x+ct} g(s) ds = 0[/tex]
[tex]\int_{x-2L}^{x} g(s) ds = -\int_{x}^{x+2L} g(s) ds[/tex]
but here is where i am stuck. How do i change the limit of integration over the left hand side

ALso I am not even sure is if this is the correct way to go? Is it the right way? Your help and advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To convert the integral on the left hand side of your final equaiton into something more useful, try the change of variable [tex]s = s' - 2L[/tex].
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K