Simple empirical formula question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stevecgz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The empirical formula of the manganese chloride compound produced from the reaction of 1.36 g of manganese with excess chlorine is determined to be Mn3Cl4. The calculation considers chlorine as Cl2, leading to the correct stoichiometric ratio. The confusion arose when chlorine was mistakenly treated as Cl, resulting in an incorrect formula of Mn3Cl. The accurate determination of the empirical formula relies on the correct interpretation of the chlorine's molecular form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of stoichiometry
  • Knowledge of empirical formulas
  • Familiarity with molecular weights of elements (Mn and Cl)
  • Ability to perform mass-to-mole conversions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study stoichiometric calculations in chemical reactions
  • Learn about empirical vs. molecular formulas in chemistry
  • Explore the concept of molecular weights and their applications
  • Review common mistakes in chemical formula derivation
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding empirical formula calculations and stoichiometric relationships in chemical reactions.

Stevecgz
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Question:
The reaction of 1.36 g of manganese with excess cholrine produced 4.00 g of chloride compound of manganese. Determine the empirical formula of the product.

If I calculate this with cholrine as [tex]Cl_{2}[/tex] I get [tex]Mn_{3}Cl_{4}[/tex].

But if I calculate it with cholrine as [tex]Cl[/tex] I get [tex]Mn_{3}Cl[/tex].

Which way is correct?

Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you get those two answers? Since you start with 1.36 g of manganese and end with 4 g of compound, there must be 4- 1.36 = 2.64 g of chlorine atoms in the compound. 1.36 g is how many manganese atoms? 2.64 g of chlorine is how many chlorine atoms? What is the ratio?
 
Doh! Dyslexia kicking in again. Thanks HallsofIvy, I found where I messed up now.

Steve
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K