Why is gravity assumed to be a wave

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jim_990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the nature of gravity and whether it can be considered a wave. Participants examine the implications of gravity's propagation speed, its relationship to general relativity, and the analogy between gravitational and electromagnetic waves.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assumption that gravity is a wave, suggesting that if it were, its propagation would be affected by mass, similar to how waves refract.
  • Others argue that while gravity is not a wave in the traditional sense, solutions to general relativity suggest the existence of gravitational waves, which are ripples in spacetime.
  • A participant draws an analogy between mass in general relativity and charge in electromagnetism, suggesting that gravitational waves have components analogous to electric and magnetic fields.
  • There is a discussion about whether gravity propagates at the speed of light, with some asserting that changes in gravitational fields propagate at this speed, while others emphasize that gravity does not act instantaneously.
  • One participant raises a hypothetical scenario about two masses appearing simultaneously and questions how they would experience each other's gravitational effects.
  • Another participant points out that the scenario of masses appearing from nowhere is problematic within the framework of general relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether gravity can be classified as a wave, with some supporting the idea of gravitational waves while others challenge this classification. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of gravity and its propagation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in applying general relativity to hypothetical scenarios, such as masses appearing from nowhere, indicating that such cases may not yield meaningful conclusions.

jim_990
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
apart from the fact gravity propogates at the speed of light, what leads people to assume it is a wave? if it were wouldn't even gravitys line of propagation be bent by proximity to mass, after all refraction and defraction occcur to waves, this would mean the moon would bend the suns lines of gravity propagation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity isn't a wave, and neither is electromagnetism. In general relativity gravity is a psuedoforce and electromagnetism is a force. And just like electromagnetic waves (ripples in the electromagnetic field) can be produced (light), there are solutions to general relativity where gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) are found. Gravitational waves are a phenomenon that is believed to occur, but they've never been observed so we're not even entirely sure they exist. Taking the analogy further, everything we've ever analyzed through quantum mechanics so far that has at one time presented itself as a wave to us has been capable of being described as a particle also. It is because of this that the graviton has been proposed. Since we can find instances in Einstein's equations where gravitational waves occur, it is believed there should be some way to also describe these waves as particles.. gravitons.
 
As a rough anology to compare E&M to gravity

mass (more accurately, energy) in GR is like charge in E&M. It's the "source" of gravity.

The gravitational force between two masses is like the electrostatic force between two charges (the coulomb force).

Moving masses cause frame-draging effects known as "gravitomagnetism", just as moving charges cause magnetism. Gravitomagnetism is, however, very weak. Gravitomagnetism has been detected already in a few experiments, however the best and most accurate test, Gravity Probe B, is currently underway.

Gravity waves are analogous to E&M waves, but instead of electric and magnetic fields gravity waves have gravitic and gravitomagnetic comonents. Note that E&M waves are related to, but different from, the coulomb force between two charges. The same thing is true about gravity and gravity waves.
 
what I am getting at is...so obviously a gravity wave must propagate at a speed,c, as waves can't occur otherwise, does gravity itself propagate at a speed, by this i mean, if 2 masses appeared from nowhere at the same time, instantly in space, would they both experience gravity of the other instantly or would we have to wait for a split second(c's worth of time over the distance between them)
 
jim_990 said:
what I am getting at is...so obviously a gravity wave must propagate at a speed,c, as waves can't occur otherwise, does gravity itself propagate at a speed, by this i mean, if 2 masses appeared from nowhere at the same time, instantly in space, would they both experience gravity of the other instantly or would we have to wait for a split second(c's worth of time over the distance between them)
Gravity doesn't act instantaneously, it travels at c, so if the Sun randomly disappeared, we'd stay in orbit for 8 minutes until both the light waves and gravitational effects left. The fact that Newton's theory of gravity is non-local (gravity travels instantaneously) was one of the major indications that it was wrong. The special theory of relativity doesn't mesh well with non-locality.
 
jim_990 said:
what I am getting at is...so obviously a gravity wave must propagate at a speed,c, as waves can't occur otherwise, does gravity itself propagate at a speed, by this i mean, if 2 masses appeared from nowhere at the same time, instantly in space, would they both experience gravity of the other instantly or would we have to wait for a split second(c's worth of time over the distance between them)

Two masses can't appear from nowhere. An attempt to apply the rules of GR to that case fails, just as an attempt to find the electric field of a charge "appearing from nowhere" fails.

However, one can show that if you perturb a gravitational field, that changes in it will propagate at a velocity that's equal to 'c' or less.

You might want to take a look at the sci.physics.faq on this topic:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K