How can Line integrals curves not matter?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of curves in line integrals, particularly in the context of conservative and non-conservative fields. Participants explore how the nature of the field affects the dependence of the integral on the path taken between limits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the importance of curves in line integrals, suggesting that only the limits matter since many functions can share the same limits.
  • Another participant explains that in conservative fields, the integral is path independent, while in non-conservative fields, different paths yield different integrals.
  • Several participants seek clarification on what constitutes a conservative field and how it affects the limits of integration.
  • A participant notes that a conservative vector field can be characterized by the integral around a closed curve being zero, implying path independence for integrals between two points.
  • Another participant emphasizes that for many line integrals, the integral does depend on the curve, contrasting this with simpler integrals where only endpoints are considered.
  • It is mentioned that not all functions can be expressed as exact differentials, which complicates the evaluation of line integrals along curves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of curves in line integrals, with some asserting that curves matter in non-conservative fields while others highlight the path independence in conservative fields. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the general applicability of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical conditions and definitions related to conservative fields and exact differentials, indicating a need for clarity on these concepts. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in determining when curves influence the integral.

Noone1982
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Thanks on the help on the other thread.

I, however, have yet another question. In the line integrals, how is it that we're integrating the various components to the limits of the curves, it seems like the curves really don't matter, just their limits.

Can someone explain how the curves are important too and not just their limits, as many functions can have the same limits ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This depends on whether you're integrating over a conservative field. If you are, the integral is path independent, but if you're not, then different paths between the same two points yield different integrals.
 
What exactly is a conservative field? How do the limits change from one type of a field to another?

How would it play into

? Ax dx + Ay dy + Az dz
 
Noone1982 said:
What exactly is a conservative field? How do the limits change from one type of a field to another?

How would it play into

? Ax dx + Ay dy + Az dz

A conservative vector field is one such that:

[tex]\oint_{C}\vec{\mathbf{F}}\cdot d\vec{\mathbf{r}}=0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
apmcavoy said:
A conservative vector field is one such that:

[tex]\int_{C}\vec{\mathbf{F}}\cdot d\vec{\mathbf{r}}=0[/tex]

Thus rather than following the curve C, you can follow any path.

That should probably read: [tex]\oint_{\gamma}\vec{\mathbf{F}}\cdot d\vec{\mathbf{r}}=0[/tex], where [tex]\gamma[/tex] is any closed curve.
Then, [tex]\int_{C}\vec{\mathbf{F}}\cdot d\vec{\mathbf{r}}[/tex] depends only on the endpoints of C. (That is, any path with the same endpoints as C will give the same value for this integral.)

The first condition can be shown to be equivalent to [tex]\vec\nabla\times \vec F=\vec 0[/tex].
 
Actually, to me the surprising thing is that for some (actually MOST) line integrals, the integral does depend on the curve!

After all, in beginning calculus, we learn that, to find [itex]\int_a^b f(x)dx[/itex], we find an anti-derivative F, such that dF= f(x)dx and evaluate at the endpoints: F(b)- F(a).

Okay, if we have [itex]\int_C f(x,y)dx+ g(x,y)dy[/itex], why not just find F(x,y) such that dF= f(x,y)dx+ g(x,y)dy and evaluate at the endpoints??

The answer, of course, is that not every (in fact few) "f(x,y)dx+ g(x,y)dy" is an "exact" differential- there may not be such an F(x,y).

But for some such an F(x,y) does exist and it's just a matter of evaluating at the end points- what happens on the curve between the endpoints, or exactly what the curve itself is, doesn't matter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K