Work and acceleration of rescue team

  • Thread starter Thread starter ViewtifulBeau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a rescue team lifting an injured spelunker out of a sinkhole in three stages, each involving a vertical distance of 11.1 m. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, specifically work, energy, and motion under acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of work done in each stage, questioning the use of average versus final velocity in their calculations. There is discussion on the forces acting against gravity and how to account for them in the work done.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the work-energy principle, suggesting that the work done can be expressed in terms of potential and kinetic energy. There is acknowledgment of differing results based on the velocities used in calculations, and the conversation is ongoing with attempts to clarify the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods they can employ. There is an emphasis on understanding the underlying physics rather than simply applying formulas.

ViewtifulBeau
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
A cave rescue team lifts an injured spelunker directly upward and out of a sinkhole by means of a motor-driven cable. The lift is performed in in three stages, each requiring a vertical distance of 11.1 m: (1) the initially stationary spelunker is accelerated to a speed of 4.06 m/s; (2) he is then lifted at the constant speed of 4.06 m/s; (3) finally he is decelerated to zero speed. How much work is done on the 69.4 kg rescue by the force lifting him during each stage?

I have to find how much work is done by the force lifting him at each stage.

First I found the average velocity 4.06/2 = 2.03 (i think because of asuming constant acceleration). Then i divide the distance by the average velocity to get 11.1 / 2.03 = 5.4679 s . So this is how long it takes to make it to the end of the 1st stage. Then i found the acceleration which is .7425 m/s/s. but i plugged it into the work formula and i got 572 J... but it is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each step is done in 11.1 m, so that makes it easier.
W=F times distance.
In each step the distance will be 11.1 m.

Step 1: 11.1 = .5at^2 a=(v_f-v_i)/t
Solve for a. Then consider what force is needed to get that acceleration (keep in mind they are working AGAINST gravity as well)

Step 2: a=0 so force is easy to figure (again, keep in mind gravity)

Step 3: acceleration is the same as step 1 except opposite in magnitude, so they are letting gravity help them here)

Hope this helps
 
The key benefit of Work and Energy approaches
is that you get to ignore the details of the motion
...like acceleration. :biggrin:
The Work done in part 1 increases PE and KE,
so W = m g Delta_h + 1/2 m v^2 .
Work in Part 2 only has the Delta_PE
Work in part 3 is Delta_PE - 1/2 m v^2 ,
since the KE_final - KE_initial = - 1/2 m v^2 .
 
Last edited:
lightgrav said:
The key benefit of Work and Energy approaches
is that you get to ignore the details of the motion
...like acceleration. :biggrin:
The Work done in part 1 increases PE and KE,
so W = m g Delta_h + 1/2 m v^2 .
Work in Part 2 only has the Delta_PE
Work in part 3 is Delta_PE - 1/2 m v^2 ,
since the KE_final - KE_initial = - 1/2 m v^2 .

touche, didn't think of that
 
ok i tried the equations and i got 7700, 7557, and 7414 J respectively. The 7557 worked but the other two didn't. So i think that my v value is wrong. I used 2.03 m/s because that would be the average. But should i use 4.06m/s?
 
Yes, you should use the final velocity: That's how much kinetic energy the system gets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K