Function f Continuity at Irrational and 0: Sketch

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f defined as f(x) = x for irrational x and f(x) = p sin(1/q) for rational x = p/q in lowest terms is continuous at x = 0 but nowhere continuous elsewhere. The limit of f as x approaches 0 from both rational and irrational sides converges to 0, confirming continuity at this point. However, for all other points, the function exhibits discontinuity, particularly due to the nature of rational numbers and their density within the real numbers. The discussion also references Dirichlet's function as a similar case of discontinuity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuity in real analysis
  • Familiarity with rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic knowledge of limits and their properties
  • Concept of functions defined piecewise
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dirichlet's function and its implications on continuity
  • Explore the concept of limits in real analysis, focusing on epsilon-delta definitions
  • Investigate the implications of rational and irrational number density in the real number line
  • Learn about piecewise functions and their continuity criteria
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching continuity concepts, and anyone interested in the properties of rational and irrational functions.

iNCREDiBLE
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Let f be that function defined by setting:

f(x) = x if x is irrational
= p sin(1/q) if x = p/q in lowest terms.

At what point is f continuous?


Continuous for irrational x, and for x = 0. Sketch:
p*sin(1/q) - p / q
= p(sin(1/q) -1/q)
But sin x - x = o(x^2) when x -> 0
So, for large q,
|p(sin(1/q) - 1/q)| < p (1/q)^2 = (p/q) / q

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, I am no master of number theory or modern algebra even. I have only observed said courses, and I have not researched my own opinion enough to give it as fact. That said, this is what I think.

Id watch my wording to prevent myself from saying continuous for irrational x, and say rather, continuous at every point x for x~irrational. the function itself is, i believe, nowhere-continuous. you might find some more searching about dirichlets function, its pretty similar.

oh, and your sketch is probably right. the function does go to 0 at x=0, and

I think the correct answer to this is that the function is continuous at x=0, since the limit of the two individual functions as x->0 from both sides is all the same value, 0. for all others, you might say that the point is continuous within the irrational space, but that in terms of the function, which lies in R, it is discontinuous.

id say it presents a problem since the sum of two irrational numbers has not been explicitly proven to be an irrational number, so there are numbers between every other number that have yet to be defined, and since many of those potentially rational numbers involves [itex]\pi[/itex] (like constant multiples of eulers constant) it might bring the possibility of creating a locally continuous point in the original space. anyhow, ill shut up since I am probably totally wrong.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K