Projectile Problem: Freefall of Falcon at 200mi/h for 100m

  • Thread starter Thread starter gasapple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a falcon in freefall. The falcon is initially moving horizontally at a speed of 200 mi/h from a height of 100m and the participants are exploring how far it falls vertically while traveling a horizontal distance of 100m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of speed and the setup of the problem, questioning how to visualize the motion. There are attempts to separate horizontal and vertical components of motion and to calculate the time of fall based on horizontal distance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on calculating time and vertical distance using equations of motion. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between horizontal and vertical motion, with multiple interpretations being considered. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify concepts without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, with some expressing uncertainty about the calculations and the implications of significant figures. There is a focus on ensuring the correct interpretation of projectile motion principles.

gasapple
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
What am I doing wrong here? I am trying to arrive at a correct answer of 6.13m but can't get there...

A falcon is moving horizontally at it's top speed (200 mi/h) at a height of 100m off the ground when it brings its wings in and drops into a freefall. How far does the bird fall vertically while traveling horizontally a distance of 100m?

I've converted the speed into 89.4 m/s (from 200 mi/h) and then isn't it simply a freefall problem for a duration of 100m? If someone could help me set it up so I can visualize it I would be appreciative. I guess I've got the initial x and y displacement relative to the Earth as well as the initial velocity, but now what?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
find time taken for 100m horizontal, with constant velocity. What vertical distance it falls in that time? (0.5gt^2)
 
So would the constant velocity for that 100m segment simply be gravity or the x-component of the velocity (top speed)? I would guess that if you separate the components it would simply be freefall at gravity for 100m?

Thanks for your help...
 
the horisontal distance = Cos(angle)*V initial* time travelled.

angle is zeor so cos 0 = 1 so you have 100 = 89.4*t and you solve for time.

the vertical distance = Sin(angle)*V initial*t + 1/2 g*t^2

Sin of 0 degrees cancels the speed, so vertical fall would be -4.9m/s^2 * t^2 that you found in the first equation.

that's how i see it...but i only took phisics one in my junior year high school. i don't know the numeric outcome...give it a quick try.

edit: hold on i'll run the numbers for you.

t of fall is 1.12 seconds (correctly sig figured assuming the 100 has 3 sig figs.

-4.9*1.12^2= -6.15 if correctly sig figured or +6.15 if you're analizing a fall...

you get it...im insulting your intelligence here with the positive/negative thing.

my answer is slightly larger than the book's...by 2 centimeters becasue of repeated roundups due to sig figs rule. if i were to work with the 14 decimals i'd probably get 6.13
 
Last edited:
OK, I'll take a look at it. Thanks for pondering it... I really appreciate it!
 
Think the bird falls for 1.12 seconds?
 
Ahh yes, you stated that in your response... THANKS! Now I know you're right - and I'm on the right track!
 
yea. what i did not write is how i came up with this i mean thinknig process.

well the bird is moving horisontally and suddenly starts to move vertically as well. horisontal speed won't change...and we only care about how far it falls during the time that it moves horisontally that distance. so the time of fall is the smae as the time it needs to travel that distance.

that's why the time is 1.12 in one equation and can be plugged into second. sorry for confusion...
 
Nah, makes perfect sense to me now. It's just a simple projectile - like a bullet fired from a gun with a dropped object - disregarding curvature of the earth, both would hit simultaneously because same y component. I think the time factor with this problem threw me off... thanks for explaining it...
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K