Question on form of differential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Noone1982
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential Form
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of a differential equation involving a function and its partial derivatives. Participants explore the application of the chain rule in this context, questioning the interpretation of variables and notation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the equation presented in their book, seeking clarification on the notation used.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on what the function u is dependent on and suggests that A(x) might be intended instead of Ax.
  • A third participant clarifies that "u" is a placeholder for variables and that "Ax" refers to A with a subscript x.
  • One participant suggests that using LaTeX could improve the clarity of the discussion and the presentation of mathematical problems.
  • A later reply presents the chain rule as a definition, implying that the equation follows from this principle.
  • Another participant expresses confusion, stating that the right-hand side of the equation seems to repeat the left-hand side rather than reformulating it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the equation and its components, indicating that there is no consensus on its validity or clarity.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions and dependencies of the variables involved, as well as the notation used in the equation.

Noone1982
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
My book says:

let p stand for partial, u is a function

p(uAx) / px = pu(Ax)/px + up(Ax)/px

How can it be valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Noone1982 said:
My book says:

let p stand for partial, u is a function

p(uAx) / px = pu(Ax)/px + up(Ax)/px

How can it be valid?

First of all, what is u a function of? Second, did you mean A(x)?
 
u is just say xyz and Ax means A subscript x
 
It would help us all if you would take a few minutes to read through this thread . LaTex is really very easy and it makes it much easier to present problems such as yours.
 
[tex]\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left( uA_{x} \right)\; =\; \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\left( A_{x} \right)+u\frac{\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}[/tex]

To me, the right hand of the equation is saying the left hand twice rather than reworking it.
 
That's just the straight-up definition of the chain rule.
 
Thanks! :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K