Heaviside's Operational Calculus and Laplace Transform

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of Heaviside's operators for solving ODEs with "exotic" inhomogeneous terms. There is a similarity between these operators and the Laplace transform, which can be shown through a direct proof. However, there are other ways to derive the Heaviside operator, such as through a recursive definition.
  • #1
Julano
7
0
Hello everyone,

I was studing Heaviside's operators for solving ODE, which I strongly recommend to have a look because it helps a lot when the differential equations have "exotic" inhomogeneous terms, but it is a method that works and you do not know exactly why.

Some biographies tell that Carson or Browmich proved that Heaviside's operators are equivalent to Laplace Transform but I have not found any work which explain this fact.

By my own I've found a kind of relation but I suppose it does not mean nothing or is a "mathematical herecy"

Well, let a general differential equation of constant coefficients:
$$ay'(x)+by(x)=F(x)$$ $$y'(x)+(b/a)y(x)=(1/a)F(x)$$
We can simplify the expression ##(b/a)=-p, f(x)=F(x)/a##
$$y'(x)-py(x)=f(x)$$
The differential equation obtained can be resolved by multipliying by an integrating factor. In this case it is ##e^{-px}##
$$e^{-px}y'(x)-pe^{-px}y(x)=e^{-px}f(x)$$
So:
$$\frac{d}{dx}(e^{-px}y(x))=e^{-px}f(x)$$

$$y(x)=e^{px}(\int f(x)e^{-px}\, dx +c1)=e^{px} \int f(x)e^{-px}\, dx +e^{px} c1$$

By means of Heaviside Operators we can express the differential equation:
$$(D-p)(y)=f(x)$$
Which is the ##(D-p)## operator applied on y. Let see what is the meaning of the inverse operator:
$$y=\frac{1}{(D-p)}f(x)=(D-p)^{-1}f(x)=e^{px}(\int f(x)e^{-px}\, dx +c1)$$

So, the inverse operator can be interpreted as this Integral:
$$(D-p)^{-1}(...):=e^{px}(\int(...) e^{-px}\, dx +c1)$$

Now, we will solve the equation by means of Laplace Transform:

$$\mathcal{L}[y'(x)-py(x)]=\mathcal{L}[f(x)]$$
$$s\mathcal{L}[y(x)]-y(0)-p\mathcal{L}[y(x)]=\mathcal{L}[f(x)]$$
$$(s-p)\mathcal{L}[y(x)]-y(0)=\mathcal{L}[f(x)]$$
$$\mathcal{L}[y(x)]=\frac{1}{(s-p)}\mathcal{L}[f(x)]+\frac{1}{(s-p)}y(0)=\frac{1}{(s-p)}\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}\, dx +\frac{1}{(s-p)}y(0)$$
$$\mathcal{L}[y(x)]=\mathcal{L}[e^{px}]\mathcal{L}[f(x)]+\mathcal{L}[e^{px}]y(0)$$
Then by solving the Transform of ##f(x)## we can find the form of ##\mathcal{L}[y(x)]## and then ##y##

Compiling the results, we have:
$$y=\frac{1}{(D-p)}f(x)=e^{px}(\int f(x)e^{-px}\, dx +c1)$$
$$\mathcal{L}[y(x)]=\frac{1}{(s-p)}\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}\, dx +\frac{1}{(s-p)}y(0)$$

These equations does not represent the same concept. The first one is the solution of the differential equation and the second one is the transform of that solution but there is a similarity between them so (maybe) this let us think that there is a close relation between this Operators and the Laplace Transform. This would suppose that the Heaviside Operators only works when Laplace Transform converges, among other things. What do you think?

The method of the Heaviside Operators for ODE of nth order is similar. We would have an operator of nth order and we would have to factorize it (finding its roots) and then solving n linear equations.

Maybe my exposition was pedantic, but I wanted to explain the problem clearly.

Thanks for your help.

Julano
 
  • #3
I completely forgot about this! My bad!

Julano said:
but it is a method that works and you do not know exactly why.

That's the tricky bit. Like you said, your relationship shows that the Heaviside operational solution can be derived from the Laplace transform when the Laplace transform converges. Here's a direct proof:

Given:
##\mathcal{L}[y] =(\frac{1}{s - p}) \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}dx + (\frac{1}{s - p})y_{0}##
##(s - p)\mathcal{L}[y] + y_{0} = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}dx##
##s\mathcal{L}[y] - y_{0} - p\mathcal{L}[y] = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}dx ##
##\mathcal{L}[Dy] - \mathcal{L}[py] = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}dx##
##\mathcal{L}[(D-p)y] = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}dx##
##(D-p)y = \mathcal{L^{-1}}[\int_{0}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-px}dx]##

This allows you to construct the Heaviside D operator from the Laplace transform if it converges. However, that's not the only way to get such an operator. Generally, D is a linear operator on analytic functions. You can write it recursively for real analytic functions as an upper triangular shift matrix in the basis of powers of x with a factor of n+1. This is the approach found in Boas.
 

1. What is Heaviside's Operational Calculus?

Heaviside's Operational Calculus is a mathematical tool used to simplify and solve differential equations. It involves transforming a differential equation into an algebraic equation, which can then be solved using standard algebraic techniques.

2. What is the Laplace Transform?

The Laplace Transform is a mathematical operation that converts a time-domain function into a frequency-domain representation. It is used in conjunction with Heaviside's Operational Calculus to solve differential equations.

3. How does Heaviside's Operational Calculus differ from traditional Calculus?

Traditional Calculus deals with continuous functions, while Heaviside's Operational Calculus deals with discontinuous functions. It also involves the use of Laplace Transform, which is not typically used in traditional Calculus.

4. What are the applications of Heaviside's Operational Calculus and Laplace Transform?

Heaviside's Operational Calculus and Laplace Transform are widely used in engineering and physics to solve differential equations that arise in various physical systems, such as electrical circuits, mechanical systems, and thermal systems.

5. Are there any limitations to using Heaviside's Operational Calculus and Laplace Transform?

Heaviside's Operational Calculus and Laplace Transform are powerful tools, but they are limited in their applicability to linear differential equations. They also require a good understanding of complex numbers and their manipulation.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
668
  • Differential Equations
Replies
17
Views
871
  • Differential Equations
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
5
Views
662
  • Differential Equations
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
671
  • Differential Equations
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top