BFern
- 1
- 0
Why is it easier to measure overall structure of Andromeda Galaxy than to measure Milky Way Galaxy?
The discussion centers on the comparative ease of measuring the overall structure of the Andromeda Galaxy versus the Milky Way Galaxy. It touches on observational challenges and techniques related to both galaxies, including visibility in different wavelengths and the effects of interstellar material.
Participants generally agree that Andromeda's overall structure is easier to measure than that of the Milky Way, but there is no consensus on the implications of this ease or the specifics of internal details that can be observed.
The discussion highlights limitations related to observational techniques, such as the impact of interstellar gas on visibility and the challenges of measuring internal details from a distance.
Because we can see the whole thing in visable light, and take neat photos, while it takes Radio and IR imaging to see through the dust and gasses blocking our view of most of our own Milky Way. Because we have to "see" our own galaxy edge-on, no neat spiral structure; we are in it.Originally posted by BFern
Why is it easier to measure overall structure of Andromeda Galaxy than to measure Milky Way Galaxy?
To add, and just for someone to look up if interested, somewhere on the web you can find an unbelievable photo of the giant elliptical galaxy M87. They say our Milky Way has about 150-200 Globular Clusters (I think more), but the photo of M87 shows good detail in the galaxy and ~10,000 (yes, ten thousand) globular clusters in the halo.Originally posted by Phobos
Welcome to Physics Forums, BFern!
Note that it's easier to see Andromeda's overall structure, but harder to see the internal details (because it's so far away).