View Full Version : transformations of functions
Intr3pid
Oct14-05, 01:31 PM
hi everyone
I have trouble recognizing expansions/compressions, and not knowing how draw graphs of recipricol transformations (of functions). can someone explain to me how to "do" them? or recommend a site that has a tutorial about it?
thanks in advance.
hotvette
Oct14-05, 02:15 PM
It might help to provide a specific example and explain where/how you are having trouble:smile:
Intr3pid
Oct14-05, 08:17 PM
say f(x) = x^2-5 , how do I graph 1/f(x). Please give an in depth explanation.
thanks in advance
The easiest way is plot points.
Intr3pid
Oct17-05, 09:31 PM
can anyone give a solution? not just unfinished sentences.
Tom Mattson
Oct17-05, 09:50 PM
The easiest way is plot points.
No, in fact that's the hardest way!
say f(x) = x^2-5 , how do I graph 1/f(x)
When graphing rational functions in general, it is best to start by finding the following:
1.) x-intercepts
2.) y-intercepts
3.) Vertical asymptotes
4.) Horizontal asymptotes
5.) Slant asymptotes
Which of these do you know how to find?
Intr3pid
Oct22-05, 04:05 PM
i really need help, i don't get what you guys are saying.
ivybond
Oct23-05, 04:40 AM
hi everyone
I have trouble ... not knowing how draw graphs of recipricol transformations (of functions).
What textbook are you using?
Does it have paragraphs "Rational Functions and Asymptotes" and
"Graphs of Rational Functions"?
g(x) = 1/f(x) is a rational function.
hotvette
Oct25-05, 12:03 PM
i really need help, i don't get what you guys are saying.
Tom Mattson had it right. You need to look for intercepts and asymptotes. Look at the reciprocal function:
g(x)=\frac{1}{x^2-5}
You need to consider what values of x will cause the function to go to zero, infinity, etc. It's always good to look at limits as x goes to zero and to infinity. You also need to consider what value of x will make the denominator go to zero (meaning what for the value of the function?)
professor
Oct25-05, 04:35 PM
what ive atleast been told, ad seems to be a fairly easy way to look at it is to call all the x values in the equation y, then all the y values x ( f(x) for ex would be y.. the changed to x ) first of all, then to solve for y -
: the first part i allways found confuzing, and useless at best, so in otherwords just switch around the equation to solve for X after you have named f(x) or f(q) or whatever "Y".
and oh yes- as mentioned above, make sure to disclude answers that will give you nonreal numbers
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.